From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Furniss Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2004 21:57:24 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] SEPARATING VOIP AND SURFING Message-Id: <41AE3E44.1010202@dsl.pipex.com> List-Id: References: <20041109175203.11372.qmail@web41524.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20041109175203.11372.qmail@web41524.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org Ricardo Soria wrote: > Very thanks for your suggestion, but... Consider that > the traffic that comes from the cisco 1600 is not > originated into itself; this router is just passing > traffic that comes from Internet (infinite source MAC > addresses possible) I don't think so - ethernet is link layer , so, I really couldn't shape > traffic by its source MAC address. So if you use iptraf lan monitor you can not see the MAC of the ciscos sending and receiving? The same for the > cisco 827, except that possible destination MAC > addresses are not so much. Traffic that my linux box > sends to cisco 827 is not finally for itself, but for > any computer in the remote subnet. Even if the MAC bit doesn't work, I think if you can manage to route the traffic properly, then you should be able to mark/filter it for shaping. Andy. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/