From: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com>
To: "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@osdl.org>
Cc: minyard@mvista.com, akpm <akpm@osdl.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPMI: use C99 struct inits.
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2004 20:16:30 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41AE7AFE.2070807@mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041201114538.195ea302.rddunlap@osdl.org>
Looks good. Thank you; it's one of the things I've been meaning to do.
-Corey
Randy.Dunlap wrote:
>Convert IPMI driver struct usage to C99 initializers.
>
>Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rddunlap@osdl.org>
>
>diffstat:=
> drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c | 6 +++---
> drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_poweroff.c | 12 +++++++++---
> drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_watchdog.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
> 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
>diff -Naurp ./drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c~ipmi_c99 ./drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c
>--- ./drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c~ipmi_c99 2004-10-18 14:54:32.000000000 -0700
>+++ ./drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c 2004-12-01 10:41:59.876793120 -0800
>@@ -3126,9 +3126,9 @@ static int panic_event(struct notifier_b
> }
>
> static struct notifier_block panic_block = {
>- panic_event,
>- NULL,
>- 200 /* priority: INT_MAX >= x >= 0 */
>+ .notifier_call = panic_event,
>+ .next = NULL,
>+ .priority = 200 /* priority: INT_MAX >= x >= 0 */
> };
>
> static int ipmi_init_msghandler(void)
>diff -Naurp ./drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_poweroff.c~ipmi_c99 ./drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_poweroff.c
>--- ./drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_poweroff.c~ipmi_c99 2004-10-18 14:54:32.000000000 -0700
>+++ ./drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_poweroff.c 2004-12-01 11:01:54.147236416 -0800
>@@ -381,11 +381,17 @@ struct poweroff_function {
> };
>
> static struct poweroff_function poweroff_functions[] = {
>- { "ATCA", ipmi_atca_detect, ipmi_poweroff_atca },
>- { "CPI1", ipmi_cpi1_detect, ipmi_poweroff_cpi1 },
>+ { .platform_type = "ATCA",
>+ .detect = ipmi_atca_detect,
>+ .poweroff_func = ipmi_poweroff_atca },
>+ { .platform_type = "CPI1",
>+ .detect = ipmi_cpi1_detect,
>+ .poweroff_func = ipmi_poweroff_cpi1 },
> /* Chassis should generally be last, other things should override
> it. */
>- { "chassis", ipmi_chassis_detect, ipmi_poweroff_chassis },
>+ { .platform_type = "chassis",
>+ .detect = ipmi_chassis_detect,
>+ .poweroff_func = ipmi_poweroff_chassis },
> };
> #define NUM_PO_FUNCS (sizeof(poweroff_functions) \
> / sizeof(struct poweroff_function))
>diff -Naurp ./drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_watchdog.c~ipmi_c99 ./drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_watchdog.c
>--- ./drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_watchdog.c~ipmi_c99 2004-10-18 14:55:28.000000000 -0700
>+++ ./drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_watchdog.c 2004-12-01 11:43:58.154528984 -0800
>@@ -518,9 +518,9 @@ static void panic_halt_ipmi_heartbeat(vo
>
> static struct watchdog_info ident=
> {
>- 0, /* WDIOF_SETTIMEOUT, */
>- 1,
>- "IPMI"
>+ .options = 0, /* WDIOF_SETTIMEOUT, */
>+ .firmware_version = 1,
>+ .identity = "IPMI"
> };
>
> static int ipmi_ioctl(struct inode *inode, struct file *file,
>@@ -748,9 +748,9 @@ static struct file_operations ipmi_wdog_
> };
>
> static struct miscdevice ipmi_wdog_miscdev = {
>- WATCHDOG_MINOR,
>- "watchdog",
>- &ipmi_wdog_fops
>+ .minor = WATCHDOG_MINOR,
>+ .name = "watchdog",
>+ .fops = &ipmi_wdog_fops
> };
>
> static DECLARE_RWSEM(register_sem);
>@@ -885,9 +885,9 @@ static int wdog_reboot_handler(struct no
> }
>
> static struct notifier_block wdog_reboot_notifier = {
>- wdog_reboot_handler,
>- NULL,
>- 0
>+ .notifier_call = wdog_reboot_handler,
>+ .next = NULL,
>+ .priority = 0
> };
>
> extern int panic_timeout; /* Why isn't this defined anywhere? */
>@@ -915,9 +915,9 @@ static int wdog_panic_handler(struct not
> }
>
> static struct notifier_block wdog_panic_notifier = {
>- wdog_panic_handler,
>- NULL,
>- 150 /* priority: INT_MAX >= x >= 0 */
>+ .notifier_call = wdog_panic_handler,
>+ .next = NULL,
>+ .priority = 150 /* priority: INT_MAX >= x >= 0 */
> };
>
>
>
>
>---
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-12-02 2:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-01 19:45 [PATCH] IPMI: use C99 struct inits Randy.Dunlap
2004-12-02 2:16 ` Corey Minyard [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41AE7AFE.2070807@mvista.com \
--to=cminyard@mvista.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=minyard@mvista.com \
--cc=rddunlap@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.