From: Bodo Stroesser <bstroesser@fujitsu-siemens.com>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
jdike@ccure.user-mode-linux.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/11] - UML - fix signal mask on delivery error
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 10:55:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41AEE6A1.4020200@fujitsu-siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1101826791.26071.108.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com>
David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-11-14 at 17:13 -0500, Jeff Dike wrote:
>
>> sigmasking.c - Makes sure that when a signal is (not) delivered to
>>a bogus stack, that a segfault is delivered then, and not after returning
>>to userspace. This is the test relevant to the patch that Andrew replied
>>to.
I don't know much about ppc64 and also don't have a machine to test.
So, I'm commenting the code only. If I've missed something, sorry for that.
The changes we did in UML, fiy two major issues:
1) they correct the sigmask after a segfault that happened in signal-delivery
2) they immediately deliver that SIGSEGV, before returning to user.
AFAICS, the patch seems to cover the first, but not the second.
If a SIGSEGV is forced since the stackframe/sigcontext for a signal-handler
could not be created, this SIGSEGV is queued only. To deliver it, do_signal()
must be called again, which normally won't happen (with the exception of
sys_sigretrun/sys_rt_sigreturn). Thus, SIGSEGV stays in the queue until the
next interrupt or syscall happens. IMHO this behavior is bad.
So, in UML we changed (kern_)do_signal, to loop over get_signal_to_deliver
and handle_signal, until a signal is delivered correctly or the task exits.
Bodo
>
>
> Corresponding patch for ppc64. Are we actually going to fix this for all
> architectures?
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ===== arch/ppc64/kernel/signal.c 1.44 vs edited =====
> --- 1.44/arch/ppc64/kernel/signal.c 2004-10-28 08:39:49 +01:00
> +++ edited/arch/ppc64/kernel/signal.c 2004-11-26 14:13:18 +00:00
> @@ -387,7 +387,7 @@
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static void setup_rt_frame(int signr, struct k_sigaction *ka, siginfo_t *info,
> +static int setup_rt_frame(int signr, struct k_sigaction *ka, siginfo_t *info,
> sigset_t *set, struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> /* Handler is *really* a pointer to the function descriptor for
> @@ -452,7 +452,7 @@
> if (err)
> goto badframe;
>
> - return;
> + return 0;
>
> badframe:
> #if DEBUG_SIG
> @@ -460,17 +460,19 @@
> regs, frame, newsp);
> #endif
> force_sigsegv(signr, current);
> + return -1;
> }
>
>
> /*
> * OK, we're invoking a handler
> */
> -static void handle_signal(unsigned long sig, struct k_sigaction *ka,
> - siginfo_t *info, sigset_t *oldset, struct pt_regs *regs)
> +static int handle_signal(unsigned long sig, struct k_sigaction *ka,
> + siginfo_t *info, sigset_t *oldset, struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> /* Set up Signal Frame */
> - setup_rt_frame(sig, ka, info, oldset, regs);
> + if (setup_rt_frame(sig, ka, info, oldset, regs))
> + return 0;
>
> if (!(ka->sa.sa_flags & SA_NODEFER)) {
> spin_lock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);
> @@ -479,6 +481,8 @@
> recalc_sigpending();
> spin_unlock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);
> }
> +
> + return 1;
> }
>
> static inline void syscall_restart(struct pt_regs *regs, struct k_sigaction *ka)
> @@ -538,8 +542,7 @@
> /* Whee! Actually deliver the signal. */
> if (TRAP(regs) == 0x0C00)
> syscall_restart(regs, &ka);
> - handle_signal(signr, &ka, &info, oldset, regs);
> - return 1;
> + return handle_signal(signr, &ka, &info, oldset, regs);
> }
>
> if (TRAP(regs) == 0x0C00) { /* System Call! */
> ===== arch/ppc64/kernel/signal32.c 1.61 vs edited =====
> --- 1.61/arch/ppc64/kernel/signal32.c 2004-10-28 08:39:49 +01:00
> +++ edited/arch/ppc64/kernel/signal32.c 2004-11-26 14:13:18 +00:00
> @@ -653,9 +653,9 @@
> * Set up a signal frame for a "real-time" signal handler
> * (one which gets siginfo).
> */
> -static void handle_rt_signal32(unsigned long sig, struct k_sigaction *ka,
> - siginfo_t *info, sigset_t *oldset,
> - struct pt_regs * regs, unsigned long newsp)
> +static int handle_rt_signal32(unsigned long sig, struct k_sigaction *ka,
> + siginfo_t *info, sigset_t *oldset,
> + struct pt_regs * regs, unsigned long newsp)
> {
> struct rt_sigframe32 __user *rt_sf;
> struct mcontext32 __user *frame;
> @@ -704,14 +704,14 @@
> regs->trap = 0;
> regs->result = 0;
>
> - return;
> + return 1;
>
> badframe:
> #if DEBUG_SIG
> printk("badframe in handle_rt_signal, regs=%p frame=%p newsp=%lx\n",
> regs, frame, newsp);
> #endif
> - force_sigsegv(sig, current);
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static long do_setcontext32(struct ucontext32 __user *ucp, struct pt_regs *regs, int sig)
> @@ -822,7 +822,7 @@
> /*
> * OK, we're invoking a handler
> */
> -static void handle_signal32(unsigned long sig, struct k_sigaction *ka,
> +static int handle_signal32(unsigned long sig, struct k_sigaction *ka,
> siginfo_t *info, sigset_t *oldset,
> struct pt_regs * regs, unsigned long newsp)
> {
> @@ -867,14 +867,14 @@
> regs->trap = 0;
> regs->result = 0;
>
> - return;
> + return 1;
>
> badframe:
> #if DEBUG_SIG
> printk("badframe in handle_signal, regs=%p frame=%x newsp=%x\n",
> regs, frame, *newspp);
> #endif
> - force_sigsegv(sig, current);
> + return 0;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -984,11 +984,20 @@
>
> /* Whee! Actually deliver the signal. */
> if (ka.sa.sa_flags & SA_SIGINFO)
> - handle_rt_signal32(signr, &ka, &info, oldset, regs, newsp);
> + ret = handle_rt_signal32(signr, &ka, &info, oldset, regs, newsp);
> else
> - handle_signal32(signr, &ka, &info, oldset, regs, newsp);
> + ret = handle_signal32(signr, &ka, &info, oldset, regs, newsp);
>
> - if (!(ka.sa.sa_flags & SA_NODEFER)) {
> + if (!ret) {
> + /* Setting up the stack frame failed, but if we came here
> + from sigsuspend we may already have masked signals.
> + Put back the old sigmask before forcing SEGV. */
> + spin_lock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);
> + current->blocked = *oldset;
> + recalc_sigpending();
> + spin_unlock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);
> + force_sigsegv(signr, current);
> + } else if (!(ka.sa.sa_flags & SA_NODEFER)) {
> spin_lock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);
> sigorsets(¤t->blocked, ¤t->blocked,
> &ka.sa.sa_mask);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-12-02 9:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-13 2:01 [PATCH 9/11] - UML - fix signal mask on delivery error Jeff Dike
2004-11-13 0:34 ` Andrew Morton
2004-11-14 22:13 ` Jeff Dike
2004-11-15 8:35 ` David Woodhouse
2004-11-22 15:30 ` David Woodhouse
2004-11-15 11:40 ` Bodo Stroesser
2004-11-15 17:18 ` Jeff Dike
2004-11-16 9:39 ` Bodo Stroesser
2004-11-30 14:59 ` David Woodhouse
2004-12-02 9:55 ` Bodo Stroesser [this message]
2004-12-02 11:25 ` Paul Mackerras
2004-12-02 11:40 ` Bodo Stroesser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41AEE6A1.4020200@fujitsu-siemens.com \
--to=bstroesser@fujitsu-siemens.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=jdike@ccure.user-mode-linux.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.