From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Steve Comfort <steve@4Dllc.com>
Subject: Is this at all possible
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 14:05:40 +0200
Message-ID: <41AF0514.4030503@4Dllc.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org>
List-Id: <netfilter.vger.kernel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter>,
	<mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </pipermail/netfilter>
List-Post: <mailto:netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter>,
	<mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org
Errors-To: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org

Hi all,

I'm 99% sure that the answer to this one is no, but a customer asked :)

They have two buildings with networks running on the same (192.168.2.x) 
subnet.

Is it possible to configure a (wireless) router that would be capable of 
routing between these identical sub-nets. Somehow, maybe restricting one 
half to addresses below 127 and getting cunning with the netmask?

Don't ask why they don't want to change to different subnets!

A resounding lack of response will be sufficient confirmation for me 
that this is a silly scenario.

Ciao
Steve Comfort