From: "Shawn Wright" <swright@sls.bc.ca>
To: Daniel Chemko <dchemko@smgtec.com>, netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: RE: Using old CPU for 100s of clients
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 13:57:10 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41B070B6.23668.B47D46A8@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7C9884991ADAE0479C14F10C858BCDF591E3A1@alderaan.smgtec.com>
On 3 Dec 2004 at 12:22, Daniel Chemko wrote:
> The Speed problems may not be isolated to your CPU. You'll want to make
> sure your conntrack table isn't getting full, and that conntracks are
> safely getting expired from your system. Are you using a custom kernel,
> or a stock distro one?
Thanks for the reply. I didn't give many details because I've already beat
this to death on the Shorewall list before coming here (I know, I should
have started here). It is a custom kernel, as all of the recent stock kernels
will not boot on this machine - APIC must be disabled (it's an old DEC
Prioris). I have tried 2.4.22, two different Mandrake releases, along with a
plain 2.4.28 from kernel.org. It is possible that I've messed up somehow,
so I plan on taking a stock 2.4.22-37mdk kernel that currently runs well on
a P3/667, and compile it, making no change except for CPU support and
APIC. This might help isolate the problem.
> Just for fun, could you forward me the following:
>
> # cat /proc/loadavg
Load average *never* goes above 0.3, currently all zeros...
I don't believe the system CPU% factors into the loadavg though?
> # free
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 223208 219472 3736 0 0 127028
-/+ buffers/cache: 92444 130764
Swap: 409616 0 409616
> # iostat 20 2 (sysstat package is nice for accounting)
don't have this installed, although I plan to...
> # top (grab the CPU lines, over time is best)
top will show up to ~13% system CPU% during a load test when I pass
1000kB/s + across the 10Mb link. Otherwise, it is rarely over 5% system.
> # cat /proc/slabinfo
I've looked at this also - our peak conntrack count is around 4000, max is
set to 16K. I've also tried it at 64K, and set the hashsize upon load of
ip_conntrack module to 64K, just for fun, made no difference.
> # cat /proc/net/ip_conntrack | wc -l
Usually around 1500, but I have seen 4000 peak.
> # hdparm /dev/<your disk(s)>
This is from the "bad" machine. All machines use a 3940 PCI SCSI with
aic7xxx driver, and one or more Seagate Cheetah 10K 9Gb drives.
/dev/sda:
readonly = 0 (off)
geometry = 1106/255/63, sectors = 17783240, start = 0
> # cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_max
Tried 16k and 64k...
> # netstat -i
This is from current live firewall (the good one). The bad one has been
rebooted since the last time I tried it live, so no data.
Kernel Interface table
Iface MTU Met RX-OK RX-ERR RX-DRP RX-OVR TX-OK TX-ERR TX-DRP TX-OVR Flg
eth0 1500 058662850 1 0 074520718 3 0 0 BMRU
eth1 1500 074674696 0 0 057280898 0 0 0 BMRU
lo 16436 0 89156 0 0 0 89156 0 0 0 LRU
> # mii-tool
I've used this exhaustively to check the NICs are setup right. The outside
NIC goes to a Cat1900 forced 10FD, and they are notoriously bad at
playing nice with NICs. No errors though as you can see above on eth1.
The inside link is 100Mb FD to a Cat 3500, and again no errors. Current
NICs are one Intel E100B (eepro100 driver), and a Dlink DFE500TX (tulip
driver). I have tried all combinations of e100/eepro100/tulip with half a
dozen different NICs, no change in symptoms.
I should mention that we can reproduce the problem within a few minutes
of hitting random web sites, waiting for one to "hang". We've eliminated
our DNS and proxy as sources of the problem - it occurs when bypassing
proxy and NATing through firewall. Have tried 3 different DNS servers,
squid reports avg DNS times of < 100ms. We're talking up to 20sec
delays before getting data from a website, even timeouts. A second visit
to same site, different pages, is quick. To duplicate we need to hit random
sites, but can do so within a few minutes, even when network load is low.
> wow.. there are a lot of areas to look into.. Anyways, hope to find
> something.
So do I...
> Good ol' BC boy!
Nice to hear from someone nearby! :-)
Thanks!
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Shawn Wright, I.T. Manager
Shawnigan Lake School
http://www.sls.bc.ca
swright@sls.bc.ca
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-12-03 21:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-03 20:22 Using old CPU for 100s of clients Daniel Chemko
2004-12-03 21:57 ` Shawn Wright [this message]
2004-12-04 1:24 ` Shawn Wright
2004-12-04 1:27 ` Michael Gale
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-12-03 20:06 Shawn Wright
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41B070B6.23668.B47D46A8@localhost \
--to=swright@sls.bc.ca \
--cc=dchemko@smgtec.com \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.