All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: George Anzinger <george@mvista.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Herbert Poetzl <herbert@13thfloor.at>
Subject: [Fwd: Re: do_posix_clock_monotonic_gettime() returns negative nsec]
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 09:46:36 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <41B0A67C.6020006@mvista.com> (raw)

Just adding my sign off.  Using forward to avoid the dreaded ">" marks

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: do_posix_clock_monotonic_gettime() returns negative nsec
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 18:22:03 +0100
From: Herbert Poetzl <herbert@13thfloor.at>
To: George Anzinger <george@mvista.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20041203020357.GA28468@mail.13thfloor.at> 
<20041202190823.4f287617.akpm@osdl.org> 
<20041203032024.GA29553@mail.13thfloor.at> <41B0297D.3050202@mvista.com>

On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 12:53:17AM -0800, George Anzinger wrote:
> Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> >On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 07:08:23PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >>Herbert Poetzl <herbert@13thfloor.at> wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>>Hi Folks!
> >>>
> >>>recent kernels (tested 2.6.10-rc2 and 2.6.10-rc2-bk15)
> >>>produce funny output in /proc/uptime like this:
> >>>
> >>>	# cat /proc/uptime
> >>>	  12.4294967218 9.05
> >>>	# cat /proc/uptime
> >>>	  13.4294967251 10.33
> >>>	# cat /proc/uptime
> >>>	  14.4294967295 11.73
> >>>
> >>>a short investigation of the issue, ended at
> >>>do_posix_clock_monotonic_gettime() which can (and 
> >>>often does) return negative nsec values (within
> >>>one second), so while the actual 'time' returned
> >>>is correct, some parts of the kernel assume that
> >>>those part is within the range (0 - NSEC_PER_SEC)
> >>>
> >>>       len = sprintf(page,"%lu.%02lu %lu.%02lu\n",
> >>>                       (unsigned long) uptime.tv_sec,
> >>>                       (uptime.tv_nsec / (NSEC_PER_SEC / 100)),
> >>>
> >>>as the function itself corrects overflows, it would
> >>>make sense to me to correct underflows too, for 
> >>>example with the following patch:
> >>>
> >>>--- ./kernel/posix-timers.c.orig	2004-11-19 21:11:05.000000000 +0100
> >>>+++ ./kernel/posix-timers.c	2004-12-03 02:23:56.000000000 +0100
> >>>@@ -1208,7 +1208,10 @@ int do_posix_clock_monotonic_gettime(str
> >>>	tp->tv_sec += wall_to_mono.tv_sec;
> >>>	tp->tv_nsec += wall_to_mono.tv_nsec;
> >>>
> >>>-	if ((tp->tv_nsec - NSEC_PER_SEC) > 0) {
> >>>+	if (tp->tv_nsec < 0) {
> >>>+		tp->tv_nsec += NSEC_PER_SEC;
> >>>+		tp->tv_sec--;
> >>>+	} else if ((tp->tv_nsec - NSEC_PER_SEC) > 0) {
> >>>		tp->tv_nsec -= NSEC_PER_SEC;
> >>>		tp->tv_sec++;
> >>>	}
> >>
> >>Doesn't this imply that do_posix_clock_monotonic_gettime_parts() is
> >>returning a negative tv_nsec?
> >
> >
> >nope, not necessarily, because after that ...
> >
> >        tp->tv_sec += wall_to_mono.tv_sec;
> >        tp->tv_nsec += wall_to_mono.tv_nsec;
> >
> >might add a negative value, which explains the
> >underflow ...
> >
> >and if you look closer:
> >
> >	xtime.tv_sec = get_cmos_time();
> >        wall_to_monotonic.tv_sec = -xtime.tv_sec;
> >        xtime.tv_nsec = (INITIAL_JIFFIES % HZ) * (NSEC_PER_SEC / HZ);
> >        wall_to_monotonic.tv_nsec = -xtime.tv_nsec;
> 
> Yep, that IS the problem.  It should be normalized here,  I.e.
> 	set_normalized_timespec(wall_to_monotonic,
> 		wall_to_monotonic.tv_sec - xtime.tv_sec,
> 		wall_to_monotonic.tv_nsec - xtime.tv_nsec);
> with the obvious delets :)

agreed, especially as almost all archs do it
properly (jsut i386 and m32r miss that)

> Still, this should be corrected by the first settimeofday, which most 
> systems do on the way up, or is that just those who use NTP?

correct, but not all use settimeofday() ...

here is a better patch:

Fix the non-normalized wall_to_monotonic for i386 and m32r
(The other archs seem to get it right)

Signed-off-by: Herbert Poetzl <herbert@13thfloor.at>
Signed-off-by: George Anzinger george@mvista.com

diff -NurpP --minimal linux-2.6.10-rc2-bk15/arch/i386/kernel/time.c 
linux-2.6.10-rc2-bk15.2/arch/i386/kernel/time.c
--- linux-2.6.10-rc2-bk15/arch/i386/kernel/time.c	2004-11-19 21:10:28.000000000 
+0100
+++ linux-2.6.10-rc2-bk15-fix/arch/i386/kernel/time.c	2004-12-03 
18:12:06.000000000 +0100
@@ -381,9 +381,9 @@ extern void (*late_time_init)(void);
  void __init hpet_time_init(void)
  {
  	xtime.tv_sec = get_cmos_time();
-	wall_to_monotonic.tv_sec = -xtime.tv_sec;
  	xtime.tv_nsec = (INITIAL_JIFFIES % HZ) * (NSEC_PER_SEC / HZ);
-	wall_to_monotonic.tv_nsec = -xtime.tv_nsec;
+	set_normalized_timespec(&wall_to_monotonic,
+		-xtime.tv_sec, -xtime.tv_nsec);

  	if (hpet_enable() >= 0) {
  		printk("Using HPET for base-timer\n");
@@ -409,9 +409,9 @@ void __init time_init(void)
  	}
  #endif
  	xtime.tv_sec = get_cmos_time();
-	wall_to_monotonic.tv_sec = -xtime.tv_sec;
  	xtime.tv_nsec = (INITIAL_JIFFIES % HZ) * (NSEC_PER_SEC / HZ);
-	wall_to_monotonic.tv_nsec = -xtime.tv_nsec;
+	set_normalized_timespec(&wall_to_monotonic,
+		-xtime.tv_sec, -xtime.tv_nsec);

  	cur_timer = select_timer();
  	printk(KERN_INFO "Using %s for high-res timesource\n",cur_timer->name);
diff -NurpP --minimal linux-2.6.10-rc2-bk15/arch/m32r/kernel/time.c 
linux-2.6.10-rc2-bk15.2/arch/m32r/kernel/time.c
--- linux-2.6.10-rc2-bk15/arch/m32r/kernel/time.c	2004-12-03 00:38:43.000000000 
+0100
+++ linux-2.6.10-rc2-bk15-fix/arch/m32r/kernel/time.c	2004-12-03 
18:00:14.000000000 +0100
@@ -275,8 +275,8 @@ void __init time_init(void)

  	xtime.tv_sec = mktime(year, mon, day, hour, min, sec);
  	xtime.tv_nsec = (INITIAL_JIFFIES % HZ) * (NSEC_PER_SEC / HZ);
-	wall_to_monotonic.tv_sec = -xtime.tv_sec;
-	wall_to_monotonic.tv_nsec = -xtime.tv_nsec;
+	set_normalized_timespec(&wall_to_monotonic,
+		-xtime.tv_sec, -xtime.tv_nsec);

  #if defined(CONFIG_CHIP_M32102) || defined(CONFIG_CHIP_XNUX2) \
  	|| defined(CONFIG_CHIP_VDEC2) || defined(CONFIG_CHIP_M32700) \


best,
Herbert


-- 
George Anzinger   george@mvista.com
High-res-timers:  http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/


                 reply	other threads:[~2004-12-03 17:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=41B0A67C.6020006@mvista.com \
    --to=george@mvista.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=herbert@13thfloor.at \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.