From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pablo Neira Subject: Re: check timer active Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2004 23:31:35 +0100 Message-ID: <41B38C47.90600@eurodev.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org, 'Henrik Nordstrom' , 'Patrick McHardy' , 'Krisztian Kovacs' Return-path: To: Richard In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Richard wrote: >>Pablo Neira wrote: >> >> >> >>>still think that you should use that function. >>> >>>Hm, I just realized that the amanda helper is faking counters, I guess >>>that we need a version of ip_ct_refresh_acct which doesn't the >>>increase skb counters. I'll send a patch to fix this once I know what >>>is scheduled with nf_conntrack. >>> >>> > >I only saw ip_ct_refresh. What's the difference between ip_ct_refresh_acct >and it? > > because you are using a caveman kernel tree :) try with 2.6.10-rc3 -- Pablo