From: P@draigBrady.com
To: Robert Love <rml@novell.com>
Cc: Kyle Moffett <mrmacman_g4@mac.com>,
Jeff Sipek <jeffpc@optonline.net>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>, Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Time sliced CFQ #2
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 17:42:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41B499FE.5000603@draigBrady.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1102351338.6052.126.camel@localhost>
Robert Love wrote:
>>The reason I proposed my ideas for tying the two values together is
>>that I am
>>concerned about breaking existing code.
>
>
> Nothing should break.
>
> If apps don't explicitly set their i/o priority, then they get the
> default. Not a big deal.
>
> This allows the default case to be the same as today.
>
> Robert Love
For reference, this was discussed last year:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=106847268508985&w=2
--
Pádraig Brady - http://www.pixelbeat.org
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-12-06 17:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-04 10:49 [PATCH] Time sliced CFQ #2 Jens Axboe
2004-12-04 16:39 ` Jeff Sipek
2004-12-05 18:58 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-06 0:29 ` Jeff Sipek
2004-12-06 1:59 ` Con Kolivas
2004-12-06 2:23 ` Jeff Sipek
2004-12-06 2:34 ` Con Kolivas
2004-12-06 5:00 ` Kyle Moffett
2004-12-06 5:14 ` Robert Love
2004-12-06 7:19 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-06 12:18 ` Helge Hafting
2004-12-06 12:24 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-06 12:21 ` Kyle Moffett
2004-12-06 16:42 ` Robert Love
2004-12-06 17:42 ` P [this message]
2004-12-06 7:15 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-06 7:13 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-05 14:21 ` Ed Tomlinson
2004-12-05 15:18 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-05 17:58 ` Ed Tomlinson
2004-12-06 9:31 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-12-06 9:35 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-06 11:48 ` Ed Tomlinson
2004-12-06 12:31 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-12-06 13:27 ` [PATCH] Time sliced CFQ #3 Jens Axboe
2004-12-06 14:01 ` Søren Lott
2004-12-06 15:01 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-06 15:45 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-06 15:07 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-12-06 23:30 ` Ed Tomlinson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41B499FE.5000603@draigBrady.com \
--to=p@draigbrady.com \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=jeffpc@optonline.net \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mrmacman_g4@mac.com \
--cc=rml@novell.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.