From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru
Cc: Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org>,
netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: [1/1] OSF: pom-ng - linux-2.6.
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 19:48:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41B74C8C.20607@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1102503753.3363.50.camel@uganda>
Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
>On Wed, 2004-12-08 at 13:58 +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
>
>
>>Since OSF originally was created in 2.5 environment
>>it is strange not to have 2.6 support for OSF.
>>This(similar) patch was sent some time ago but was lost.
>>Please apply.
>>
>>Signed-off-by: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru>
>>
>>
>
>My dear hands, please contact my brain before doing anything.
>Thanks.
>
>
And I need to read first before complaining :)
>Proper patch attached.
>
>
Still doesn't apply, it seems to be present already. The latest
change was two month ago.
~/src/nf/svn/netfilter/trunk/patch-o-matic-ng$ patch -p1 </tmp/pom.diff
--dry-run
(Stripping trailing CRs from patch.)
patching file osf/info
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n]
Apply anyway? [n]
Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file osf/info.rej
The next patch would create the file
osf/linux-2.6/include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ipt_osf.h,
which already exists! Assume -R? [n]
Apply anyway? [n]
Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file
osf/linux-2.6/include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ipt_osf.h.rej
The next patch would create the file
osf/linux-2.6/net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_osf.c,
which already exists! Assume -R? [n]
Apply anyway? [n]
Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file
osf/linux-2.6/net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_osf.c.rej
The next patch would create the file
osf/linux-2.6/net/ipv4/netfilter/Kconfig.ladd,
which already exists! Assume -R? [n]
Apply anyway? [n]
Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file
osf/linux-2.6/net/ipv4/netfilter/Kconfig.ladd.rej
The next patch would create the file
osf/linux-2.6/net/ipv4/netfilter/Makefile.ladd,
which already exists! Assume -R? [n]
Apply anyway? [n]
Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file
osf/linux-2.6/net/ipv4/netfilter/Makefile.ladd.rej
Anyhow, it still needs to handle non-linear skbs. Have a look
at the other matches and their use of skb_header_pointer.
Regards
Patrick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-12-08 18:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-08 10:58 [1/1] OSF: pom-ng - linux-2.6 Evgeniy Polyakov
2004-12-08 11:02 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2004-12-08 18:48 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2004-12-12 15:13 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2005-01-02 23:31 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-12-08 13:32 ` Pavel A. Nekrasov
2004-12-08 13:43 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2004-12-08 18:44 ` Patrick McHardy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41B74C8C.20607@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru \
--cc=laforge@netfilter.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.