From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Jones Subject: Re: pptp conntrack patch missing argument Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 00:32:11 -0600 Message-ID: <41BBE5EB.50603@hivemynd.net> References: <1102718548.41ba265486969@webmail.sld.cu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1102718548.41ba265486969@webmail.sld.cu> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Ali Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org Hi Ali, Thanks for the info! I should be able to give this a spin, against a 2.4.28 source tree, and test it in the next week or so! Thanks again for pointing this out. I didn't think of scanning the rest of the sources for calls to the same function in other sources, very good plan! Best regards, SJ PS: I CC'd the netfilter list with your suggestion in the hopes that it does indeed fix the problem with the latest pom-ng release. Ali wrote: >Hi Stephen, > >While compiling a 2.4.27 kernel i suffered of the same problem you reported >on the netfilter list and as you, searching on the web don't provide me any >solution, but digging in the source i found that all calls to ip_nat_used_tuple >in net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_nat_proto_* used the same convention: > if (!ip_nat_used_tuple(tuple, conntrack, maniptype, range->flags)) >changing line 108 in ip_nat_proto_gre.c to that make it compile cleanly. So far >i haven't yet tested if it works ok but thougth that you may be interested :). > >Best regards, > Ali > >Pd: i'm not in the netfilter list (found your message in google) that's the reason to >me writing you directly > > >------------------------------------------------- >Este mensaje fue enviado usando el servicio de correo en web de Infomed >http://webmail.sld.cu > > > >