All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
To: george@mvista.com
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>,
	Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>,
	dipankar@in.ibm.com, ganzinger@mvista.com,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: RCU question
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 23:40:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <41BCC8F8.3030102@colorfullife.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41BC771D.6020506@mvista.com>

George Anzinger wrote:

>
> The "normal" idle loop just looks at the need_resched flag and goes 
> right back to the hlt,

That's the problem: If a the tasklet does a wakeup then the reschedule 
is delayed until the next interrupt. Testing need_resched and executing 
hlt must be atomic, but it isn't - NMIs break the atomicity.
Not a big deal, except if someone implements a tickless kernel. I think 
we can ignore it for now [or was the thread started by someone who 
want's to disable the hardware timer when the system is really idle?]

--
    Manfred

  reply	other threads:[~2004-12-12 22:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-12-09 23:59 RCU question George Anzinger
2004-12-10  4:31 ` Dipankar Sarma
2004-12-10 19:42   ` George Anzinger
2004-12-10 20:40     ` Dipankar Sarma
2004-12-10 20:45       ` Lee Revell
2004-12-10 21:02         ` George Anzinger
2004-12-10 22:58           ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-12-11  2:22             ` George Anzinger
2004-12-11  2:45               ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-12-11  3:29                 ` George Anzinger
2004-12-11 14:52                   ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-12-11 16:32                     ` Manfred Spraul
2004-12-11 16:52                       ` George Anzinger
2004-12-12  2:53                         ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-12-12  8:59                           ` Manfred Spraul
2004-12-12  9:37                             ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-12-12 10:22                               ` Manfred Spraul
2004-12-12 12:15                                 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-12-14 21:40                                   ` Lee Revell
2004-12-14 22:23                                     ` [patch, 2.6.10-rc3] safe_hlt() & NMIs Ingo Molnar
2004-12-14 22:47                                       ` Ingo Molnar
2004-12-14 23:09                                         ` Linus Torvalds
2004-12-15  8:52                                           ` Ingo Molnar
2004-12-15 15:44                                             ` Linus Torvalds
2004-12-15 16:35                                               ` Ingo Molnar
2004-12-16  0:37                                           ` Alan Cox
2004-12-16  1:58                                             ` Linus Torvalds
2004-12-16 14:51                                               ` Ingo Molnar
2004-12-16 15:08                                                 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2004-12-16 15:11                                                   ` Ingo Molnar
2004-12-16 15:42                                                     ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2004-12-16 15:54                                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-12-16  2:10                                             ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-12-16 13:26                                               ` Alan Cox
2004-12-14 23:41                                         ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-12-14 23:00                                       ` Linus Torvalds
2004-12-15  5:04                                         ` Andi Kleen
2004-12-15  6:27                                       ` Avi Kivity
2004-12-15  8:51                                         ` Ingo Molnar
2004-12-12 16:51                                 ` RCU question George Anzinger
2004-12-12 22:40                                   ` Manfred Spraul [this message]
2004-12-13  5:22                                     ` George Anzinger
2004-12-12 16:26                             ` Zwane Mwaikambo
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-04-29 19:07 RCU Question siddharth teotia
     [not found] <CAJw6sH0=pZX__YaeMwozF673u3Dyn7Jzp3g9q2FuYurThO6paw@mail.gmail.com>
2016-04-29 19:10 ` siddharth teotia
     [not found] ` <CAJw6sH0kFFVvmWm2vRQ+KNTgJaKVXS47OCATY2zHTA0AiSipiQ@mail.gmail.com>
2016-05-02 20:53   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
     [not found]   ` <1208862117.75733.1462222380579.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
2016-06-04  0:21     ` siddharth teotia

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=41BCC8F8.3030102@colorfullife.com \
    --to=manfred@colorfullife.com \
    --cc=andrea@suse.de \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=ganzinger@mvista.com \
    --cc=george@mvista.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
    --cc=zwane@arm.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.