From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: walter harms Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:46:15 +0000 Subject: Re: [KJ] bitkeeper tree for kjt patchset? Message-Id: <41BF26E7.7000502@bfs.de> MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============42659251621094318==" List-Id: References: <1103041747.8263.16.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <1103041747.8263.16.camel@localhost.localdomain> To: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org --===============42659251621094318== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 02:29:07PM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote: > >>What do you think of a bk repository for kjt? I did a search and i >>didn't see anything related with this topic, am i missing something ? > > > For the kind of patches in -kj, a BK tree wouldn't be a great idea. > It's the wrong usage model for janitor patches. > > Hi ppl, i agree that BK ist not the way to go since KJ patches are more random, and will later go to other maintainer of drivers/subsystems like that (IMHO). But i agree with Gustavo that submitters need a better overview what is going on. in a way that would allow to maintains to tkae notice of changes (no idea who that can be done) re, walter --===============42659251621094318== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Kernel-janitors mailing list Kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors --===============42659251621094318==--