From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Chris Cox <ccox@airmail.net>
Subject: Re: Reiser4 and ZFS
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 10:27:41 -0600
Message-ID: <41C065FD.7020909@airmail.net>
References: <20041215064608.66493.qmail@web50901.mail.yahoo.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-22788-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
In-Reply-To: <20041215064608.66493.qmail@web50901.mail.yahoo.com>
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
To: reiserfs-list@namesys.com

Job Bob wrote:
...
>   So if ZFS is not the vaporware that WinFS is, what
> new features of ZFS are worth incorporating into
> Reiser fs? Will Reiser fs continue to stay ahead of
> ZFS?

ZFS is vaporware at the moment.  A marketing blurb,
not a released product.  An alpha version will probably
come for Solaris 10 about mid year... not sure when
it will be "blessed" for production use.

Folks closer to Sun are welcome to correct my
assessment.