From: Brian King <brking@us.ibm.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: drivers/block/scsi_ioctl problem
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 10:31:45 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41C1B871.2010504@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041216063218.GA22982@suse.de>
Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 15 2004, Brian King wrote:
>
>>Brian King wrote:
>>
>>>>It was added to be able to find out which opcode was rejected and thus
>>>>caused an application malfunction. It dumps the specific opcode only
>>>>once, is that such a huge problem?
>>>
>>>
>>>Ok. I didn't realize that it was only dumped once. That's not as bad. I
>>>guess it might be better if it were only dumped if the op actually failed.
>>
>>How about something like this...
>
>
>>Currently if an SG_IO ioctl is issued to a block device with an
>>unknown opcode, an error is logged. This error is logged regardless
>>the device successfully processes the command or not. This results in
>>an error getting logged for each unknown opcode ever issued. This patch
>>changes this policy and only prints the unknown opcode if the command
>>fails.
>
>
> How about just moving it after the CAP_SYS_RAWIO check, so that it only
> logs for commands we explicitly reject? The purpose of the opcode dump
> is not to log failed commands (the app should do that itself), but
> mainly why a specific opcode was _not_ sent to the drive. This is
> something you cannot always directly gauge, unless you have the source
> for the app. And even then you have to dig :-)
I guess that would make more sense. Patch looks good.
Thanks
-Brian
>
> ===== drivers/block/scsi_ioctl.c 1.62 vs edited =====
> --- 1.62/drivers/block/scsi_ioctl.c 2004-11-20 01:50:56 +01:00
> +++ edited/drivers/block/scsi_ioctl.c 2004-12-16 07:30:39 +01:00
> @@ -199,14 +199,14 @@
> return 0;
> }
>
> + /* And root can do any command.. */
> + if (capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO))
> + return 0;
> +
> if (!(type & CMD_WARNED)) {
> cmd_type[cmd[0]] = CMD_WARNED;
> printk(KERN_WARNING "scsi: unknown opcode 0x%02x\n", cmd[0]);
> }
> -
> - /* And root can do any command.. */
> - if (capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO))
> - return 0;
>
> /* Otherwise fail it with an "Operation not permitted" */
> return -EPERM;
>
>
--
Brian King
eServer Storage I/O
IBM Linux Technology Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-12-16 16:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-14 23:49 drivers/block/scsi_ioctl problem Brian King
2004-12-15 5:32 ` Douglas Gilbert
2004-12-15 7:18 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-15 19:13 ` Brian King
2004-12-15 22:44 ` Brian King
2004-12-16 6:32 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-16 16:31 ` Brian King [this message]
2005-10-07 14:13 ` Brian King
2005-10-07 17:41 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41C1B871.2010504@us.ibm.com \
--to=brking@us.ibm.com \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.