From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262044AbUL1C7l (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Dec 2004 21:59:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262035AbUL1C7F (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Dec 2004 21:59:05 -0500 Received: from smtp-241.ig.com.br ([200.226.132.241]:23194 "EHLO smtp-241.ig.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262032AbUL1C6Z (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Dec 2004 21:58:25 -0500 Message-ID: <41D0CB8E.5060006@ig.com.br> Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 00:57:18 -0200 From: Eduardo Tompson Pereira Reply-To: duaspila@ig.com.br User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041221 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: ppscsi on kernel Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-iGspam-global: Unsure, spamicity=0.556833 - pe=5.57e-01 - pf=0.556833 - pg=0.556833 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Won't the Linux kernel include the ppscsi and all it's drivers on it? I have this scanner (ColorPage EP) that uses the Adaptec SCSI emulation on the parallel port and I'm using kernel 2.4, which is doing fine with the patch I got from the net for this specific series. But I'm worried because I'm thinking of going up to 2.6 and that the patch will be incompatible. Why such an old driver used by so many people can't be included on the source, even on the 2.4 series? Thanks, Eduardo Tompson Pereira duaspila@ig.com.br PS: Please reply me personally because I'm not subscribed to the lists. Thanks.