diff for duplicates of <41D18B9E.2080706@penguincomputing.com> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 7d98e40..c0680f0 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ guess it doesn't matter now. >The adm1026 driver, OTOH, does use the id value in all debug messages, >and it also only reconfigures the GPIO pins for the first client only ->(id = 0). Although this is a real use of the id, it only matters if you +>(id == 0). Although this is a real use of the id, it only matters if you >use the module parameters for GPIO pins reconfiguration and actually >have more than one ADM1026 chip (a quite rare chip if you remember). > @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ schematics from the vendor for the part of the motherboard attached to the chip so that I could program it correctly. > I think we can get rid of the ->"id = 0" test and reconfigure "all" ADM1026 chips (which really is only +>"id == 0" test and reconfigure "all" ADM1026 chips (which really is only >one for the two known boards using an ADM1026). > > diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 6e98e68..0ea6a2c 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ "ref\020041227230402.272fafd0.khali@linux-fr.org\0" "ref\041D0942B.8020109@penguincomputing.com\0" "ref\020041228114258.35e9b5b7.khali@linux-fr.org\0" - "From\0ppokorny@penguincomputing.com (Philip Pokorny)\0" - "Subject\0[RFC] I2C: Remove the i2c_client id field\0" - "Date\0Thu, 19 May 2005 06:25:28 +0000\0" + "From\0Philip Pokorny <ppokorny@penguincomputing.com>\0" + "Subject\0Re: [RFC] I2C: Remove the i2c_client id field\0" + "Date\0Tue, 28 Dec 2004 08:36:46 -0800\0" "To\0LM Sensors <sensors@stimpy.netroedge.com>" " LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>\0" "Cc\0Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>\0" @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ "\n" ">The adm1026 driver, OTOH, does use the id value in all debug messages,\n" ">and it also only reconfigures the GPIO pins for the first client only\n" - ">(id = 0). Although this is a real use of the id, it only matters if you\n" + ">(id == 0). Although this is a real use of the id, it only matters if you\n" ">use the module parameters for GPIO pins reconfiguration and actually\n" ">have more than one ADM1026 chip (a quite rare chip if you remember).\n" ">\n" @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ "the chip so that I could program it correctly.\n" "\n" "> I think we can get rid of the\n" - ">\"id = 0\" test and reconfigure \"all\" ADM1026 chips (which really is only\n" + ">\"id == 0\" test and reconfigure \"all\" ADM1026 chips (which really is only\n" ">one for the two known boards using an ADM1026).\n" "> \n" ">\n" @@ -88,4 +88,4 @@ "\n" :v) -63d61ae5fa6ffa4cf06feaebb89f63b43babc82a0dd24f811fd411e810c4cc90 +445c7ada9ff9e98a8b42068412ba1a874877b8dcf87562da045182caf645225b
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.