All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Walter Liu <Walter.liu@126.com>
To: Tetsuo Handa <from-linux-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Is CAP_SYS_ADMIN checked by every program !?
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 11:52:27 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <41D37B7B.2010400@126.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200412291347.JEH41956.OOtStPFFNMLJVGMYS@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>

Tetsuo Handa wrote:

>  Hello.
>
>I found a strange behavior with kernel 2.6.9 and later. ( I haven't tested for 2.6.8 and earlier. )
>It seems to me that every program calls capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN),
>even for programs such as cat(1) sed(1) ls(1).
>My environment is Fedora Core 3.
>
>The following is the patch for checking.
>
>----- Start of Patch -----
>*** sched.h.org Sat Dec 25 06:33:59 2004
>--- sched.h     Wed Dec 29 13:00:53 2004
>***************
>*** 870,875 ****
>--- 870,882 ----
>  #else
>  static inline int capable(int cap)
>  {
>+       if (cap == CAP_SYS_ADMIN) {
>+               static pid_t last_pid = 0;
>+               if (current->pid != last_pid) {
>+                       printk("euid=%d uid=%d %s %s\n", current->euid, current->uid, cap_raised(current->cap_effective, CAP_SYS_ADMIN) ? "true" : "fa
>lse", current->comm);
>+                       last_pid = current->pid;
>+               }
>+       }
>        if (cap_raised(current->cap_effective, cap)) {
>                current->flags |= PF_SUPERPRIV;
>                return 1;
>----- End of Patch -----
>
>Programs run as root always show "true", and run as non-root always show "false",
>but it's will be OK.
>I can't understand why every program checks for CAP_SYS_ADMIN .
>With 2.4.28 and RedHat 9, no such behavior happens.
>
>Is this normal behavior for 2.6 ?
>
>  
>
The POSIX capability mechanism  is  the OS privilege  mechanism ,
like the privilege mechanism in  VMS  or NT .
I think that every process  for  any capability  have to check them,
This is a must operation..

Regards
LWT


  reply	other threads:[~2004-12-30  3:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-12-29  4:47 Is CAP_SYS_ADMIN checked by every program !? Tetsuo Handa
2004-12-30  3:52 ` Walter Liu [this message]
2004-12-30  4:45 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2004-12-30  5:35 ` Kyle Moffett
2004-12-30  5:46   ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-12-30  6:13     ` Bernd Eckenfels
2004-12-30  7:40   ` Tetsuo Handa
2004-12-30  8:24     ` Bernd Eckenfels
2005-01-03 13:52     ` Stephen Smalley
2004-12-30 13:37 ` Tetsuo Handa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=41D37B7B.2010400@126.com \
    --to=walter.liu@126.com \
    --cc=from-linux-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.