From: Derrik Pates <dpates@dsdk12.net>
To: Adam Heath <doogie@brainfood.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: xen 2.0.1, 2.4.27, 2.6.9, non-bridge
Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2005 00:57:46 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41D63BDA.9030909@dsdk12.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0412312326240.21792@gradall.private.brainfood.com>
Adam Heath wrote:
> For 2.0, the way the bridge is configured breaks the existing networking, upon
> which nfsroot is running.
I don't see how. The only thing I've run into is the fact that the
included script that's supposed to configure up xen-br0 doesn't transfer
the config properly to xen-br0 from eth0, and doesn't change eth0's IP
to 0.0.0.0; I'm intending to just remove the script from my Xen systems,
and just configure the bridge device the right way from the word go.
> However, with *both* 2.4.27 *and* 2.6.9, I am getting kernel panics. I have
> not run the oops on 2.4 thru ksymoops. The built in oops decode logic in
> 2.6.9 shows a null pointer in the arp_send routine.
Well, that's an interesting bug; while I'm not a developer, I'd suggest
running the Oops text through ksymoops (with an appropriate System.map),
and sending the decoded Oops to the list along with anything else relevant.
> As a side node, it'd be nice if the network backend allowed for a pointopoint
> topology, or the existing method. Ie, I'd like it switchable.
Hack the script; there's nothing magical about the bridge setup, you can
use traditional IP routing if you want. As pointed out in the
documentation, the virtual network interfaces are simply like having
NICs in between real systems, with a crossover cable interconnecting;
you can do anything network-wise from there, the default assumption is
simply that you'll want to start with bridging, because it's simple, and
just like what most people are expecting.
--
Derrik Pates
dpates@dsdk12.net
-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-01 5:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-01 5:32 xen 2.0.1, 2.4.27, 2.6.9, non-bridge Adam Heath
2005-01-01 5:57 ` Derrik Pates [this message]
2005-01-01 6:53 ` Adam Heath
2005-01-01 7:51 ` Derrik Pates
2005-01-01 21:13 ` Adam Heath
2005-01-01 10:43 ` Keir Fraser
2005-01-01 16:09 ` Ronald G. Minnich
2005-01-01 21:20 ` Adam Heath
2005-01-01 23:29 ` Adam Heath
2005-01-01 23:40 ` Adam Heath
2005-01-02 2:47 ` Adam Heath
2005-01-02 3:52 ` Adam Heath
2005-01-02 11:06 ` Keir Fraser
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-01-01 12:22 James Harper
2005-01-01 21:19 ` Adam Heath
2005-01-05 0:28 Ian Pratt
2005-01-05 0:42 ` Adam Heath
2005-01-05 1:13 ` Jody Belka
2005-01-05 1:12 Ian Pratt
2005-01-05 6:18 ` Adam Heath
2005-01-05 1:30 Ian Pratt
2005-01-05 2:06 ` Jody Belka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41D63BDA.9030909@dsdk12.net \
--to=dpates@dsdk12.net \
--cc=doogie@brainfood.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.