From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Furniss Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 16:40:32 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] [PATCH] mark in u32 Message-Id: <41DC1880.6090405@dsl.pipex.com> List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org Thomas Graf wrote: > * Andy Furniss <41DC06D8.70301@dsl.pipex.com> 2005-01-05 15:25 > >>Thomas Graf wrote: >> >>>>That looks handy :-) Do you know why fw mark doesn't work with policers >>>>in 2.6 (assuming it's not just me) >>> >>> >>>Be prepared to see it removed again in favour of the meta extended >>>match. Don't rely too much on it. >> >>I searched a bit around meta data recently but couldn't find much - do >>you have any links? > > > http://oss.sgi.com/archives/netdev/2004-12/msg00767.html > http://oss.sgi.com/archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00028.html Thanks. > > >>http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=lartc&m0122532022827&w=2 > > > Do you see the police/action stats being updated? i.e. does > the matching itself work? From memory yes - counters showed OK on iptables and tc -s qdisc ls dev eth0 just no drops I'll repeat tonight to be sure. Andy. > > Ingress qdisc reads from prerouting hook as well, might be > a priority issue. > _______________________________________________ > LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/ > _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/