From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Thu, 06 Jan 2005 19:36:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from alpha.total-knowledge.com ([IPv6:::ffff:209.157.135.102]:30668 "EHLO alpha.total-knowledge.com") by linux-mips.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 19:35:58 +0000 Received: (qmail 21761 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2005 02:22:43 -0800 Received: from c-24-6-216-150.client.comcast.net (HELO ?192.168.0.238?) (24.6.216.150) by alpha.total-knowledge.com with SMTP; 6 Jan 2005 02:22:43 -0800 Message-ID: <41DD9313.4030105@total-knowledge.com> Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 11:35:47 -0800 From: "Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh" Organization: Total Knowledge User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041221 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ralf Baechle CC: Adrian Bunk , Andrew Morton , greg@kroah.com, Ladislav Michl , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sensors@stimpy.netroedge.com, linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] 2.6.10-mm2: let I2C_ALGO_SGI depend on MIPS References: <20050106002240.00ac4611.akpm@osdl.org> <20050106181519.GG3096@stusta.de> <20050106192701.GA13955@linux-mips.org> In-Reply-To: <20050106192701.GA13955@linux-mips.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.6.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 6821 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ilya@total-knowledge.com Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips Ralf Baechle wrote: >On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 07:15:20PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > >>There's no reason for offering a MIPS-only driver on other architectures >>(even though it does compile). >> >>Even better dependencies on specific MIPS variables might be possible >>that obsolete this patch, but this patch fixes at least the !MIPS case. >> >> > >Please make that depend on SGI_IP22 || SGI_IP32 instead; the only machines >actually using it. > >Ladis, is VisWS using this algo also? > > Since MACE is common part, it most likely does. > Ralf > > > From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ilya@total-knowledge.com (Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh) Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 06:25:29 +0000 Subject: [2.6 patch] 2.6.10-mm2: let I2C_ALGO_SGI depend on MIPS Message-Id: <41DD9313.4030105@total-knowledge.com> List-Id: References: <20050106002240.00ac4611.akpm@osdl.org> <20050106181519.GG3096@stusta.de> <20050106192701.GA13955@linux-mips.org> In-Reply-To: <20050106192701.GA13955@linux-mips.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Ralf Baechle Cc: Adrian Bunk , Andrew Morton , greg@kroah.com, Ladislav Michl , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sensors@stimpy.netroedge.com, linux-mips@linux-mips.org Ralf Baechle wrote: >On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 07:15:20PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > >>There's no reason for offering a MIPS-only driver on other architectures >>(even though it does compile). >> >>Even better dependencies on specific MIPS variables might be possible >>that obsolete this patch, but this patch fixes at least the !MIPS case. >> >> > >Please make that depend on SGI_IP22 || SGI_IP32 instead; the only machines >actually using it. > >Ladis, is VisWS using this algo also? > > Since MACE is common part, it most likely does. > Ralf > > >