From: Chris Cox <ccox@airmail.net>
To: reiserfs-list@namesys.com
Subject: Re: rebuild-tree working for more then 3 days- what to do?
Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 17:35:41 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41DF1CCD.8010900@airmail.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050108002947.0f149ce2.xslf@xslf.com>
Shoshannah Forbes wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 16:13:27 +0300
> "Vladimir Saveliev" <vs@namesys.com> wrote:
>
>
>>reiserfsck --rebuild-tree 's speed depends of file set substantially.
>>The worst case - a lots (millons) of small files.
>>But even in that case on average today hardware it should not take more
>>than 4-5 hours for 60gb filesystem.
>>Please inform us how does it progress. Pass 0 is the longest usually.
>
>
> It ran, fixed some errors, and now I have my system back (plus a bunch of portage files in lost+found). Yippy!
> Now I should go a buy that DVD-R I was thinking of getting, and make sure I have proper backups :-)
>
Not sure about this.. but I have observed that some systems trash resierfs3
pretty badly, while others do not. The problem seems a bit worse with LVM.
For example a Compaq n610c laptop will trash reiserfs3 on hard shutdown or crash
about 1 out of every 3 times (with entire directory trees going to lost+found
even though no writes involved the files there). Likewise for my dual
AMD using the Tyan S2468UGN mb. But my laptop, Toshiba 3000-s504 is fine.
And my dual Opteron (Sun w2100z) is fine. These can be crashed, powered off
without everything going into lost+found. I suspect something is up.. and
it may be chipset related (??).
Can't explain it.... just what I've observed.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-07 23:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-07 8:50 rebuild-tree working for more then 3 days- what to do? Shoshannah Forbes
2005-01-07 9:02 ` Shoshannah Forbes
2005-01-07 10:20 ` Vladimir Saveliev
2005-01-07 12:11 ` Shoshannah Forbes
2005-01-07 12:33 ` Vladimir Saveliev
2005-01-07 12:43 ` Spam
2005-01-07 13:03 ` Shoshannah Forbes
2005-01-07 13:13 ` Vladimir Saveliev
2005-01-07 22:29 ` Shoshannah Forbes
2005-01-07 23:35 ` Chris Cox [this message]
2005-01-08 4:46 ` Shoshannah Forbes
2005-01-07 12:44 ` Shoshannah Forbes
2005-01-07 13:03 ` Vladimir Saveliev
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-01-07 12:57 Yiannis Mavroukakis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41DF1CCD.8010900@airmail.net \
--to=ccox@airmail.net \
--cc=reiserfs-list@namesys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.