From: Neil Horman <nhorman@redhat.com>
To: Gergely Madarasz <gorgo@broadband.hu>
Cc: linux-net@vger.kernel.org, bridge@lists.osdl.org
Subject: [Bridge] Re: tg3 bridge problems
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 15:43:56 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41E2E90C.7010307@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050110200922.GO7529@thunderchild.debian.net>
Gergely Madarasz wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 02:53:10PM -0500, Neil Horman wrote:
>
>>Gergely Madarasz wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 02:41:34PM -0500, Neil Horman wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Gergely Madarasz wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 12:40:57PM -0500, Neil Horman wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Gergely Madarasz wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 11:04:55AM -0500, Neil Horman wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Strange. My concern was that the tg3 interface has its hardware
>>>>>>>>reset whenever its set to be up, and part of that is a resetting of
>>>>>>>>its receive mode. If for some reason IFF_PROMISC was cleared after
>>>>>>>>you set it using brctl, the interface might be taken out of promisc
>>>>>>>>mode. Do you have any iptables rules running that might drop bpdus?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>No iptables rules az all. Btw iptables wouldn't prevent tcpdump from
>>>>>>>seeing the packets, would it?
>>>>>>>Could it be that the driver perhaps has a problem setting promisc mode
>>>>>>>when resetting the hardware?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Not really sure about this. One experiment is worth a thousand guesses
>>>>>>I suppose....... I'll try and let you know. :)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>I did some other checks, like adding an explicit ifconfig eth0 promisc,
>>>>>then looking at tcpdump output - I didn't see any stray packets like I
>>>>>usually do, just ethernet broadcasts and unicasts to my mac, this also
>>>>>points to a problem that the ethernet interface is actually not in
>>>>>promisc, while the driver thinks it is.
>>>>>
>>>>>And it is probably not a driver-only issue. I've got older machines with
>>>>>tg3 running fine with bridge (with an older tg3 driver), and eth1 on the
>>>>>same machine also runs fine. On another machine I tested today, an IBM
>>>>>x326, the same thing happens - eth0 broken, eth1 fine. Would access to
>>>>>one
>>>>>of these machines help? :)
>>>>>
>>>>>Greg
>>>>
>>>>I've got a tg3 card here. I'll try re-create it as soon as I have time.
>>>
>>>
>>>Sounds great, but I expect it will not occur with a random tg3 card,
>>>explained above...
>>>
>>
>>Mmmmm....post your lspci -vvv entry for your broken tg3 card?
>
>
> on the ibm x346:
>
> 0000:05:00.0 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5721 Gigabit Ethernet PCI Express (rev 01)
> Subsystem: IBM: Unknown device 02c6
> Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr+ Stepping- SERR+ FastB2B-
> Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR-
> Latency: 0, Cache Line Size: 0x10 (64 bytes)
> Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 16
> Region 0: Memory at cfff0000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=64K]
> Capabilities: [48] Power Management version 2
> Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1- D2- AuxCurrent=0mA PME(D0-,D1-,D2-,D3hot+,D3cold+)
> Status: D0 PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=1 PME-
> Capabilities: [50] Vital Product Data
> Capabilities: [58] Message Signalled Interrupts: 64bit+ Queue=0/3 Enable-
> Address: bfa4b67f4b6720bc Data: aadf
> Capabilities: [d0] #10 [0001]
>
> The other one looks the same, just bus 06 instead of 05 and different
> Region 0 and Address lines.
>
> Same problem, other machine (ibm x326):
>
> 0000:02:01.0 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5704 Gigabit Ethernet (rev 03)
> Subsystem: IBM: Unknown device 02a6
> Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B-
> Status: Cap+ 66MHz+ UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR-
> Latency: 64 (16000ns min), Cache Line Size: 0x10 (64 bytes)
> Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 24
> Region 0: Memory at fe010000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=64K]
> Region 2: Memory at fe000000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=64K]
> Capabilities: [40] Capabilities: [48] Power Management version 2
> Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1- D2- AuxCurrent=0mA PME(D0-,D1-,D2-,D3hot+,D3cold+)
> Status: D0 PME-Enable+ DSel=0 DScale=1 PME-
> Capabilities: [50] Vital Product Data
> Capabilities: [58] Message Signalled Interrupts: 64bit+ Queue=0/3 Enable-
> Address: 3aaf3ffdeb65f8f4 Data: b0db
>
> Greg
Crud, you're right, I've got a completely different tg3 card. I'll
still try to get a bridge set up to recreate, but it won't tell us much
if the problem doesn't re-create. Can you put a printk in right before
netif_receive_skb in tg3_rx to print out the source mac address of any
received frames, we should be able to search for any MACs ==
01-80-C2-00-00-00, and determine for sure if the hardware is eating the
frame, or something else is dropping it prematurely.
Neil
--
/***************************************************
*Neil Horman
*Software Engineer
*Red Hat, Inc.
*nhorman@redhat.com
*gpg keyid: 1024D / 0x92A74FA1
*http://pgp.mit.edu
***************************************************/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-10 20:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-10 14:06 [Bridge] tg3 bridge problems Gergely Madarasz
2005-01-10 15:05 ` [Bridge] " Neil Horman
2005-01-10 15:45 ` Gergely Madarasz
2005-01-10 16:04 ` Neil Horman
2005-01-10 16:18 ` Gergely Madarasz
2005-01-10 17:40 ` Neil Horman
2005-01-10 19:11 ` Gergely Madarasz
2005-01-10 19:41 ` Neil Horman
2005-01-10 19:49 ` Gergely Madarasz
2005-01-10 19:53 ` Neil Horman
2005-01-10 20:09 ` Gergely Madarasz
2005-01-10 20:43 ` Neil Horman [this message]
2005-01-11 9:16 ` Gergely Madarasz
2005-01-11 4:06 ` Paul Schulz
2005-01-11 8:52 ` Gergely Madarasz
2005-01-11 12:36 ` Neil Horman
2005-01-11 12:58 ` Gergely Madarasz
2005-01-11 13:12 ` Neil Horman
2005-01-11 14:07 ` Gergely Madarasz
2005-01-11 20:19 ` dave
2005-01-12 9:21 ` Gergely Madarasz
2005-01-10 19:34 ` Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41E2E90C.7010307@redhat.com \
--to=nhorman@redhat.com \
--cc=bridge@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=gorgo@broadband.hu \
--cc=linux-net@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.