From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?B?SmFuIEt1bmRyw6F0?= Subject: Re: Re: Xen and reiser4 Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 14:43:19 +0100 Message-ID: <41E67AF7.3000504@fzu.cz> References: <41C08801.4060908@spaceball.cjb.net> <41C088F2.4070400@spaceball.cjb.net> <41C330E5.3000707@spaceball.cjb.net> <41E43317.9020702@spaceball.cjb.net> <41E443EB.10305@fzu.cz> <41E46347.70706@spaceball.cjb.net> <41E533A4.2070603@fzu.cz> <41E583F6.2010201@concepts.net.nz> <41E59E06.7040507@fzu.cz> <41E5AE1E.1060402@concepts.net.nz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <41E5AE1E.1060402@concepts.net.nz> Sender: xen-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: xen-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: Jerome Brown Cc: xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Jerome Brown wrote: > Bug has been closed WONTFIX as there is a glibc version which does this > (with the ntplonly useflag as I explained earlier) NPTL and LinuxThreads are mutualy exclusive implmentations of the same thing (they can coexist together, but only one of them can be used at the moment), while TLS is an addition to NPTL. Is this correct, or am I mistaken? "nptl" use flag will compile both NPTL and LinuxThreads version (or only NPTL on glibc-20040808-r1), while nptlonly will build only NPTL, without LinuxThreads support, AFAIK. -jkt -- cd /local/pub && more beer > /dev/mouth ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt