From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jan_Kundr=E1t?= Subject: Re: nfsroot and brige Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 15:06:16 +0100 Message-ID: <41E68058.1040101@fzu.cz> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: xen-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: xen-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: Keir Fraser Cc: "Ronald G. Minnich" , Ian Pratt , Adam Sulmicki , xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Keir Fraser wrote: >> >>On Wed, 12 Jan 2005, Ian Pratt wrote: >> >> >>>I'm actually going off the whole idea of bridging rather than routeing >>>as the default... >> >>I am with you. I don't think the bridge thing has worked out. I thought it >>was just me, but then I watched this list and realized it's a lot of >>people having trouble with it. > > > Yes, I think we should try routing instead. Should be easy to concoct > some replacement scripts? What about performance comparsion? What is faster, ipv4 routing or L2 bridging? (-> you'll have to recompile & restart domain0 for adding support of more protocols ;-)) You'll have to configure your routers to route traffic for unprivileged host via domain0 IP address, right? It's more difficult for newbies than setting up bridging properly, IMHO. -jkt -- cd /local/pub && more beer > /dev/mouth ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt