All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tim Moore <linux-raid@nsr500.net>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: raid5 performance after upgrade to 2.4.28
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 08:25:40 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <41E6A104.4080608@nsr500.net> (raw)


Did values change in /proc/sys/vm/{min,max}-readahead?

http://lists.us.dell.com/pipermail/linux-poweredge/2004-February/036166.html


Guy wrote:
> Now the bad news...
> 
> I have 2 CPUs  P3-500Mhz, 512Meg ram.  So I ran 2 bonnies at the same time.
> 
> Kernel 2.4.20-8 with 2 Bonnies at the same time:
> Version  1.03 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
>               -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
> Machine  Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP  /sec %CP
> watkins-ho 1G  3091  85 18593  44  9733  24  3443  97 59895  60 249.6   6
> watkins-ho 1G  2980  87 21176  54 10167  23  3478  99 44525  44 384.2   9
>                ----     -----     -----      ----    ------     -----
> Total          6071     39769     19900      6921    104420     633.8
> 
> Kernel 2.4.28 with 2 Bonnies at the same time:
> watkins-ho 1G  4456  92 17922  52  6489  17  4961  96 26571  32 320.4  12
> watkins-ho 1G  4343  89 17987  52  6197  17  4946  96 25646  31 363.7   7
>                ----     -----     -----      ----    ------     -----
> Total          8799     35909     12686      9907     52217     684.1
> 
> Very odd, the sequential read speed is almost exactly 1/2 now.
> 
> Oh well, I still can't tell without a tool to measure the speed.
> But I still don't like it!
> 
> My network is only 100BaseT, so it is still well beyond that!
> 
> Guy
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org
> [mailto:linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Guy
> Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 1:17 AM
> To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: raid5 performance after upgrade to 2.4.28
> 
> About 1 month ago I upgraded from Kernel 2.4.20-8 to 2.4.28.
> Today I noticed my sequential read speed is up by about 12%.
> 
> I don't recall making any other changes that would affect speed.
> So, I guess the Kernel upgrade made the difference.
> 
> An old bonnie output:
> Version  1.03 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
>               -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
> Machine  Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP  /sec %CP
> watkins-ho 1G  3293  97 34587  89 22306  53  3549  99 67492  63 500.1   9
> 
> Today:
> watkins-ho 1G  4944  99 31719  65 18538  43  5184  98 75440  71 602.5   8
>                ^^^^                          ^^^^     ^^^^^     ^^^^^
> 
> Some things improved, others decreased.
> 
> Of course, no change I can notice on my own.
> I needed to measure performance to notice.
> 
> I guess I should try Kernel 2.6 some day.
> 
> Guy
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 


-- 
  | for direct mail add "private_" in front of user name

             reply	other threads:[~2005-01-13 16:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-01-13 16:25 Tim Moore [this message]
2005-01-13 16:45 ` raid5 performance after upgrade to 2.4.28 Guy
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-01-12  5:18 raid5 performance - 2.4.28 Tim Moore
2005-01-12  6:17 ` raid5 performance after upgrade to 2.4.28 Guy
2005-01-12  7:44   ` Guy
2005-01-13 16:24     ` Tim Moore

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=41E6A104.4080608@nsr500.net \
    --to=linux-raid@nsr500.net \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.