From: David Masover <ninja@slaphack.com>
To: Jake Maciejewski <maciejej@msoe.edu>
Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com
Subject: Re: AMD64 progress?
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 18:03:50 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41E70C66.90704@slaphack.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1105594407.32495.8.camel@gentoo>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Jake Maciejewski wrote:
| There was mention of Namesys getting an AMD64 machine. Do you guys have
| it yet? Has there been any progress on my reiser4 bug(s), particularly
| the "reiser4_find_next_zero_bit(bnode_working_data(bnode), end_offset,
| start_offset) >= end_offset" problem?
I'd like to second this. I'm looking at getting an AMD64 machine soon,
but if AMD64 support isn't stable by the time I have the money, I might
dump it for desktop use. No repacker, no shrinker, bugs with AMD64...
Hate to say it, but until the transactions / metafiles / transparent
compression/encryption is done, XFS is looking better every day.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQIVAwUBQecMZngHNmZLgCUhAQI5vhAAn+p2ni1YLptts79vDdJZy9l/YS3AhgAQ
kh9EYBRonrLTCPdEYTExvvkQlEug0v1CZWY5ovFSLRJAjsj6prBPBIXrnxm/xLtX
v4ZQu7RAyAPSDdsBq6J42QA8mb2oL34qG65wJdcWZLgZfDbAdi3nf8iaIyY3kq7t
vRcGbrllikcn1UwlDF1b/urTbyHmP7Gc64VJlL0JbPlAi7VdiiVEauc/5XWD38l9
NhKjg2+z0d4qe6JMmMK0i6y65bGdRD9he1rLpCO1YfQ4NlEXg4ml+L757XN9b3Ys
1Q1TxEenCV4jff1Mjji75Uz+EbxasWGN2OEPk7g0qdY9TaMo3KyaUV9ANl3FnCUu
rncJVjfnAhFQ8polmyQtGWg7D4gi3yOdqDp/oAMeeofUNoMbl7MnPv2lX+z0kXHX
SQgV2MX1RTQgtTsrO+ENwMx625oYWHrV9gU9WIyn1WvV7fe/X6OxBnL0arbM71mn
/q9PEmIowDidN9MxqDasP5W4Hl/EDLNJpZU+WoymJa2o2jK29o/HIe+LyuUkMytP
hhylAE77iaTWiTITCFjXr6gf53/8Z2Nue3OPmQqjswVkrJ8EaqACvhwamytwNHQs
C8ZAjwNwQottjb7AtJglVkQ8JtGsGxMV5ogwVR4ej/Tnz4VUbw3QzisBBypFvVpp
Uwsd80C2lYw=
=f0Zv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-14 0:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-13 5:33 AMD64 progress? Jake Maciejewski
2005-01-14 0:03 ` David Masover [this message]
2005-01-14 20:17 ` Alex Zarochentsev
2005-01-14 22:58 ` Jake Maciejewski
2005-01-16 2:26 ` Isaac Chanin
2005-02-07 13:29 ` Alex Zarochentsev
2005-02-07 19:34 ` Jake Maciejewski
2005-02-07 19:51 ` Alex Zarochentsev
2005-02-08 18:25 ` Jake Maciejewski
2005-02-08 19:12 ` Alex Zarochentsev
2005-02-08 20:49 ` Jake Maciejewski
2005-02-08 20:29 ` Isaac Chanin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41E70C66.90704@slaphack.com \
--to=ninja@slaphack.com \
--cc=maciejej@msoe.edu \
--cc=reiserfs-list@namesys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.