From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org>,
Netfilter Development Mailinglist
<netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org>,
Pablo Neira <pablo@eurodev.net>,
Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu>
Subject: Re: nf_conntrack [was Re: [PATCH 1/4] RFC: fast string matching infrastrure for netfilter]
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 18:52:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41E806D2.6040108@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1105686102.7311.101.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Rusty Russell wrote:
>It was IRC, and for IPv6 I agree with Harald that it's probably not the
>right mechanism. I prefer a simple discriminated union and two slab
>caches (IPv4 and IPv6), which is hardcoded, but still fairly easy to
>read.
>
>
Sounds good.
>Does that mean I should *not* send the expectation and NAT patches to
>DaveM now? (Posted before the ct_extend patches):
>
No, I just meant we need to stop at some point some so nf_conntrack has a
chance of beeing resynced.
Regards
Patrick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-14 17:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-09 22:23 [PATCH 1/4] RFC: fast string matching infrastrure for netfilter Pablo Neira
2005-01-09 23:10 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-01-09 23:19 ` Pablo Neira
2005-01-10 19:54 ` nf_conntrack [was Re: [PATCH 1/4] RFC: fast string matching infrastrure for netfilter] Jozsef Kadlecsik
2005-01-10 20:31 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-01-10 21:28 ` Harald Welte
2005-01-14 2:45 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-01-14 4:31 ` nf_conntrack Yasuyuki KOZAKAI
2005-01-14 7:01 ` nf_conntrack [was Re: [PATCH 1/4] RFC: fast string matching infrastrure for netfilter] Rusty Russell
2005-01-14 8:20 ` Patrick Schaaf
2005-01-15 18:18 ` KOVACS Krisztian
2005-01-16 16:09 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2005-01-14 8:37 ` Harald Welte
2005-01-14 10:22 ` Rusty Russell
2005-01-14 18:02 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-01-14 17:52 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2005-01-14 8:31 ` Harald Welte
2005-01-14 18:00 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-01-14 3:16 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-01-10 21:20 ` Harald Welte
2005-01-10 8:49 ` [PATCH 1/4] RFC: fast string matching infrastrure for netfilter Sven Schuster
2005-01-10 23:18 ` Pablo Neira
2005-01-10 10:06 ` Harald Welte
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41E806D2.6040108@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu \
--cc=laforge@netfilter.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
--cc=pablo@eurodev.net \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.