From: Reuben Farrelly <reuben-lkml@reub.net>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Neil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au>
Subject: Re: Breakage with raid in 2.6.11-rc1-mm1 [Regression in mm]
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 00:02:04 +1300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41EA49AC.7070504@reub.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fa.kv41q3p.1nn82gh@ifi.uio.no>
Hi,
Reuben Farrelly wrote:
> At 12:58 a.m. 15/01/2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
>> Reuben Farrelly <reuben-lkml@reub.net> wrote:
>> >
>> > Something seems to have broken with 2.6.11-rc1-mm1, which worked ok
>> with
>> > 2.6.10-mm3.
>> >
>> > NET: Registered protocol family 17
>> > Starting balanced_irq
>> > BIOS EDD facility v0.16 2004-Jun-25, 2 devices found
>> > md: Autodetecting RAID arrays.
>> > md: autorun ...
>> > md: ... autorun DONE.
<snip>
>> > Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on
>> unknown-block(0,0)
>> >
>> > The system is running 5 RAID-1 partitions, and md2 is the root as per
>> > grub.conf. Problem seems to be that raid autodetection finds no raid
>> > partitions :(
>> >
>> > The two ST380013AS SATA drives are detected earlier in the boot, so
>> I don't
>> > think that's the problem..
>>
>> hm, the only raidy thing we have in there is the below. Maybe you could
>> try reverting that?
>>
>>
>> --- 25/drivers/md/raid5.c~raid5-overlapping-read-hack 2005-01-09
>> 22:20:40.211246912 -0800
>> +++ 25-akpm/drivers/md/raid5.c 2005-01-09 22:20:40.216246152 -0800
>> @@ -232,6 +232,7 @@ static struct stripe_head *__find_stripe
>> }
>>
>> static void unplug_slaves(mddev_t *mddev);
>> +static void raid5_unplug_device(request_queue_t *q);
>>
>> static struct stripe_head *get_active_stripe(raid5_conf_t *conf,
>> sector_t sector,
>> int pd_idx, int noblock)
>
>
> Ok the breakage occurred somewhere between 2.6.10-mm3 (works) and
> 2.6.11-rc1 (doesn't work) ie wasn't introduced into the latest -mm
> patchset as I first thought.
>
> Are there any other patches that might be worth a try backing out?
>
> reuben
I did a full untar of the source and rebuilt my (crusty old) config file
from scratch, and it seems to have come right now. Can't really explain
it though...but obviously wasn't a problem with the -mm release as I
first though. Now running -rc1-mm1 with no problems and no other patches.
Thanks to those who helped on what turned out to be a false alarm.
reuben
next parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-16 11:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <fa.h2tu7ia.m3ir1o@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.kv41q3p.1nn82gh@ifi.uio.no>
2005-01-16 11:02 ` Reuben Farrelly [this message]
2005-01-14 10:50 Breakage with raid in 2.6.11-rc1-mm1 [Regression in mm] Reuben Farrelly
2005-01-14 11:58 ` Andrew Morton
2005-01-14 12:18 ` Reuben Farrelly
2005-01-14 12:43 ` Reuben Farrelly
2005-01-14 16:56 ` Randy.Dunlap
2005-01-15 12:21 ` Sander
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41EA49AC.7070504@reub.net \
--to=reuben-lkml@reub.net \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.