From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jacob Gorm Hansen Subject: Re: x2d2 Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 01:58:46 -0800 Message-ID: <41EE2F56.6090304@diku.dk> References: <41EDC398.8090700@diku.dk> <41EDFF10.301@codemonkey.ws> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <41EDFF10.301@codemonkey.ws> Sender: xen-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: xen-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: Anthony Liguori Cc: Xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Anthony Liguori wrote: > Jacob Gorm Hansen wrote: > >> hi, >> >> is x2d2 (the minimal xend replacement in C if I understand correctly) >> still alive? I do not have bk at the moment, but grepping on x2d2 in >> the Changelog file only has a comment back from November. I can make >> it compile by removing -Werror from the Makefile, but is anyone using >> it and working on it, or is it a dead end? > > > I don't think so. It shouldn't actually work anymore. It doesn't do > proper notifications on event channels. There's also a bug in the way > ports are allocated. > > Is there still interest in x2d2 (or any C-based minimal xend)? I think > I could fix x2d2 pretty easily. > Yes, lots of interest from me, the python xend effectively keeps me from running Xen 2.0, so I am still stuck with 1.3. The stock xend uses too much memory, provides too much functionality, and depends on too many third-party packages -- not the ideal specs for the minimal trusted computing base I am trying to develop :-( Jacob ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt