From: Ludo Stellingwerff <ludo@protactive.nl>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: Does anybody work on supporting SPD matching Netfilter MARKS?
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 19:56:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41EEAD74.4030804@protactive.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1106145684.4934.32.camel@hubcap.ljm.dom>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Thank for you reaction Jason,
and sorry about the cross post, you're right, my mistake:(
The question I raised was not about the filtering side, but about the
policy match. What NetBSD is capable of is to use it's packetfilter
for deciding ipsec policies, by using a "tag".
In Linux terms this would mean that by using a firewall mark you could
use the netfilter matching structure instead of the SPD internal matches.
spdadd mark 1 -P out esp/transport//require
This would read: All packages marked with firewall mark 1 should be
encrypted and send on a transport mode ipsec connection.
Does anyone know some sort of implementation doing this?
Greetings,
Ludo.
Jason Opperisano wrote:
| On Wed, 2005-01-19 at 01:44, Ludo Stellingwerff wrote:
|
|> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
|>
|> Hi All,
|>
|> I was wondering if someone has been working on and/or has a patch
|> which implement's the use of Netfilter Marks for ipsec spd
|> matching under the linux kernel 2.6. This would be similar to the
|> NetBSD "tagged" option of 'setkey':
|>
|> spdadd tagged "ssh" -P out esp/transport//require
|>
|> But then something like:
|>
|> ~ spdadd tagged 1 -P out esp/transport//require or spdadd
|> mark 1 -P out esp/transport//require
|
|
| this may not be "good enough" for what you need--but why not just
| MARK the ESP packets in mangle PREROUTING, for later filtering:
|
| iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -p 50 -s $VPN_PEER_1 \ -j MARK
| --set-mark 1
|
| iptables -A [INPUT|FORWARD] -m mark --mark 1 [...] -j ACCEPT
|
| also--have a look at the "policy" match in POM, as i *think* it
| will do what you want.
|
| and finally--please don't cross-post--it's poor form.
|
| -j
|
| -- "Let us all bask in television's warm glowing warming glow."
| --The Simpsons
|
|
|
- --
Ludo Stellingwerff
V&S B.V. The Netherlands
ProTactive firewall solution.
Tel: +31 172 416116
Fax: +31 172 416124
site: www.protactive.nl
demo: http://www.protactive.nl:81/netview.html
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFB7q1zOF3sCpZ+AJgRAjtqAKCVQ1cmcsFauxen7GUGtint/K2atgCfY6T9
I+FYowE8/BgFYvvKMD/u7fA=
=cMnB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-19 18:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-19 6:44 Does anybody work on supporting SPD matching Netfilter MARKS? Ludo Stellingwerff
2005-01-19 14:41 ` Jason Opperisano
2005-01-19 18:56 ` Ludo Stellingwerff [this message]
2005-01-19 18:58 ` Jason Opperisano
2005-01-19 19:12 ` Lopsch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41EEAD74.4030804@protactive.nl \
--to=ludo@protactive.nl \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.