From: Mark Bellon <mbellon@mvista.com>
To: Kanoa Withington <kanoa@cfht.hawaii.edu>
Cc: David Dougall <davidd@et.byu.edu>,
Mario Holbe <Mario.Holbe@TU-Ilmenau.DE>,
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: No response?
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 12:44:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41F00A09.208@mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.55.0501200927000.31637@umi.cfht.hawaii.edu>
Kanoa Withington wrote:
>Ideally a different HBA altogether, but a different channel on a
>multichannel HBA at a minimum. If your SCSI card is not a multichannel
>card, think about getting one or think about a completely different
>arrangement.
>
>It may be possible to tune the HBA reset behavior or the XFS timeout
>threshold but as a matter of principle when constructing disk mirrors
>you should try to keep the disks as separate as possible. You should
>only need to tune, tweak or patch if you are trying to do something
>unusual - which you are not.
>
>
Very true.
The default parameters for SCSI (5 retries as I recall) can take a very
long time when a SCSI bus reset is called for (settle times and such) -
I've seen 2+ minutes. Even with totally redundent controllers a logical
I/O (to the RAID) could be held up waiting for a physical I/O by this
long. The XFS parameter would need to be raised above the threadhold.
mark
>In the short term, unplug the failing disk:
>
>Jan 10 11:56:06 linux-sg2 kernel: SCSI disk error : host 0 channel 0 id 0 lun 47
>
>You are better off without it if your system is crashing.
>
>-Kanoa
>
>
>
>On Thu, 20 Jan 2005, David Dougall wrote:
>
>
>
>>By "different controller" do you mean HBA controller or disk controller?
>>The disk devices are on completely different jbods. They are both through
>>the same HBA(the server only has 1 PCI slot)
>>--David Dougall
>>
>>
>>On Thu, 20 Jan 2005, Kanoa Withington wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Yes, that's a standard XFS timeout and shutdown. If your second disk
>>>is on the sme SCSI channel try moving it to a different one,
>>>preferably a different controller alotgether.
>>>
>>>Your disk 08:10 does have real problems, but they are separate from
>>>the XFS shutdown which should be prevented by the MD layer.
>>>
>>>-Kanoa
>>>
>>>On Thu, 20 Jan 2005, David Dougall wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> return code = 8000002
>>>>Jan 10 11:56:08 linux-sg2 kernel: Info fld=0xc7c0181, Current sd08:10:
>>>>sense key
>>>> Hardware Error
>>>>Jan 10 11:56:08 linux-sg2 kernel: I/O error: dev 08:10, sector 209453441
>>>>Jan 10 11:56:08 linux-sg2 kernel: I/O error in filesystem
>>>>("device-mapper(254,1)
>>>>") meta-data dev device-mapper(254,1) block 0x18fa318f
>>>>("xlog_iodone") err
>>>>or 5 buf count 2048
>>>>Jan 10 11:56:08 linux-sg2 kernel:
>>>>xfs_force_shutdown(device-mapper(254,1),0x2) c
>>>>alled from line 966 of file xfs_log.c. Return address = 0xc0246d9b
>>>>Jan 10 11:56:08 linux-sg2 kernel: Filesystem "device-mapper(254,1)": Log
>>>>I/O Err
>>>>or Detected. Shutting down filesystem: device-mapper(254,1)
>>>>Jan 10 11:56:08 linux-sg2 kernel: Please umount the filesystem, and
>>>>rectify the
>>>>problem(s)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>I don't see any error messages from md in any of these logs.
>>>>--David Dougall
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>-
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-20 19:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-20 17:55 No response? David Dougall
2005-01-20 18:12 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-20 18:14 ` Gordon Henderson
2005-01-20 18:37 ` Mark Bellon
2005-01-20 19:15 ` David Dougall
2005-01-20 19:35 ` Mark Bellon
2005-01-20 19:37 ` Gordon Henderson
2005-01-20 19:41 ` Mark Bellon
2005-01-20 19:49 ` David Dougall
2005-01-20 18:21 ` Mike Hardy
2005-01-20 18:30 ` Mario Holbe
2005-01-20 18:57 ` David Dougall
2005-01-20 19:12 ` Kanoa Withington
2005-01-20 19:17 ` David Dougall
2005-01-20 19:23 ` Guy
2005-01-20 19:34 ` Kanoa Withington
2005-01-20 19:44 ` Mark Bellon [this message]
2005-01-20 19:18 ` Guy
2005-01-20 19:24 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-20 19:51 ` David Dougall
2005-01-20 19:28 ` Mark Bellon
2005-01-20 18:49 ` Kanoa Withington
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41F00A09.208@mvista.com \
--to=mbellon@mvista.com \
--cc=Mario.Holbe@TU-Ilmenau.DE \
--cc=davidd@et.byu.edu \
--cc=kanoa@cfht.hawaii.edu \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.