From: Samuel Jean <sj-netfilter@cookinglinux.org>
To: Krzysztof Oledzki <olenf@ans.pl>
Cc: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: ipt_time fixes (resend, sorry)
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 19:23:48 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41F04B94.3070902@cookinglinux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0501202346450.3962@bizon.gios.gov.pl>
Krzysztof Oledzki wrote:
> I'm not sure if adding a negation-like-workaround to ipt_time (and
> possible other matches like ipt_limit) is a good idea.
Obviously, I would need to peek at the code to continue following this
thread. However, my brain is already spinning on other codes.
> My qestion is:
> why we cannot simply negate all matches?
I guess it would confuse the user when the match uses multiple options.
Am confused just thinking about it :)
But am also in the favor that all matches should accept and behave the
right way with negation unless negation really doesn't make sense nor
does anything usefull.
Maybe I missed a match that really doesn't make sense with negation.
(I surely did)
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Krzysztof Olędzki
Cheers,
Samuel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-21 0:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-14 14:04 ipt_time fixes (resend, sorry) Krzysztof Oledzki
2005-01-14 14:37 ` Bill Rugolsky Jr.
2005-01-14 14:48 ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2005-01-14 15:32 ` Samuel Jean
2005-01-14 15:24 ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2005-01-14 16:27 ` Brad Fisher
2005-01-14 16:35 ` Brad Fisher
2005-01-20 13:40 ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2005-01-20 16:35 ` Brad Fisher
2005-01-20 17:18 ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2005-01-20 18:33 ` Samuel Jean
2005-01-20 18:45 ` Brad Fisher
2005-01-20 22:54 ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2005-01-21 0:23 ` Samuel Jean [this message]
2005-02-01 12:06 ` Harald Welte
2005-02-01 16:52 ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2005-02-15 0:57 ` Harald Welte
2005-04-05 8:18 ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2005-04-10 20:26 ` Harald Welte
2005-04-12 18:45 ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2005-01-14 22:47 ` Samuel Jean
[not found] ` <200502030010.47260.fabrice.marie@fma-rms.com>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.62.0502150219100.17929@bizon.gios.gov.pl>
2005-02-15 15:23 ` Fabrice MARIE
2005-02-15 15:58 ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2005-02-16 15:24 ` Fabrice MARIE
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41F04B94.3070902@cookinglinux.org \
--to=sj-netfilter@cookinglinux.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
--cc=olenf@ans.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.