From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from viefep15-int.chello.at (viefep15-int.chello.at [213.46.255.19]) by mail.linbit.com (LINBIT Mail Daemon) with ESMTP id 7DA20142FF for ; Mon, 24 Jan 2005 13:32:27 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <41F4EADA.6080902@wollmersdorfer.at> Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 13:32:26 +0100 From: Helmut Wollmersdorfer MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jens Axboe Subject: Re: [Drbd-dev] Re: drbd uses wrong API for struct bio References: <20050123161633.GH24350@marowsky-bree.de> <20050124082433.GB2820@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20050124082433.GB2820@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Lars Marowsky-Bree , drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com List-Id: Coordination of development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Jens Axboe wrote: > Patch looks fine, I'm sad to say that if drdb was just in the kernel > source this would have been found in time... Is there any technical, organizational or sozial reason against an integration into kernel.org? Helmut Wollmersdorfer