From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Mon, 24 Jan 2005 20:48:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from gateway-1237.mvista.com ([IPv6:::ffff:12.44.186.158]:22000 "EHLO hermes.mvista.com") by linux-mips.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 24 Jan 2005 20:48:24 +0000 Received: from mvista.com (prometheus.mvista.com [10.0.0.139]) by hermes.mvista.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 469351854D; Mon, 24 Jan 2005 12:48:22 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <41F55F15.6050107@mvista.com> Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 12:48:21 -0800 From: Manish Lachwani User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4.2) Gecko/20040308 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ralf Baechle Cc: Thiemo Seufer , linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] TX4927 processor can support different speeds References: <20050123192318.GA22681@prometheus.mvista.com> <20050123194140.GL15265@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> <20050123195129.GA1806@linux-mips.org> <41F40B8E.2080003@mvista.com> <20050124202244.GB2376@linux-mips.org> In-Reply-To: <20050124202244.GB2376@linux-mips.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 7023 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: mlachwani@mvista.com Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips Ralf Baechle wrote: >On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 12:39:42PM -0800, Manish Lachwani wrote: > > > >>Why is this approach (in the patch) bad? >> >> > >It's fragile because clock frequencies are changing faster in today's >world of electronics than the weather in April. > > Ralf > > > So? Can you be a little more clear? Thanks Manish Lachwani