From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Randy.Dunlap" Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 16:58:27 +0000 Subject: Re: [KJ] [RFC] TODO file cleanups Message-Id: <41F67AB3.3060204@osdl.org> List-Id: References: <20050117231123.GC19162@nd47.coderock.org> In-Reply-To: <20050117231123.GC19162@nd47.coderock.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Domen Puncer wrote: >> >>Second stage, that i'm doing now is to put stuff into sections (like it >>is at the beginning of file). >>I'm also thinking about ordering from easiest to hardest. > > > I tried doing this, diff is ugly, lots of reordering, moving and > making items from below shorter. Easiest to hardest ordering is very > rough and subjective. Rough and subjective are expected IMO, but also helpful to newcomers. > I think i added all new suggestions. > Deleted rcpci45.c and module licences entries. > > So... is it better, or should i just continue with previous version? > > > $Id: TODO,v 1.25 2004/12/29 23:03:14 domen Exp $ > -==========- > > -None of the following items are in any order of importance or difficulty. > -Where possible related items have been grouped together. > +Send patches that add/fix items to kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org. > +Please don't add items to end of file. > > > +Where it makes sense, sections are supposed to be ordered by incresing > +difficulty. > + > +Links are marked with: > +D: description/information about the issue > +E: example patch I like the shortened version (with D: and E:), although I expect that some people would rather see the D: inline instead of having to follow links. Also, it could easily be a little too sparse (or spartan) for people who are new to Linux. Crud, that doesn't help any, does it? Did you get any other feedback on this? -- ~Randy _______________________________________________ Kernel-janitors mailing list Kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors