From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Masover Subject: Re: r4.1 ? Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 17:54:33 -0600 Message-ID: <41F6DC39.6000705@slaphack.com> References: <27547285.20050125224458@wp.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <27547285.20050125224458@wp.pl> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Pysiak Satriani Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Pysiak Satriani wrote: | Hi, | | I was wondering how close are we to reiser4.1 ? | Like in % of work done or some other measure. | | http://www.namesys.com mentions r4.1 | | 'this and that' will be included in r4.1 Which means it would either be included in some sort of experimental form of r4, or (more likely, I think) in a new branch. I haven't seen any work on any of the things delayed for 4.1, meaning either we are 0% done, or Hans has moved to a cathedral style of development. That, or I just haven't noticed such work. I don't often read source code. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQIVAwUBQfbcOHgHNmZLgCUhAQIt5A//V477ZEMTobpz4II7I3gIzEzlzqScWkhF O09kFgT1RLhFsQbZnlEr3H7pMBG5IopN7u67rY3bAtrmiP+OuQg6viBuywVRCHKV /olNDpnxmdKv1eCuqIvmWWdwg6HVxuZ/jy5owwUuU22n0PRu7X+EkfHex92hJ6zQ cZLjq4Xe2MuH6Y7lF7z8Low3vn74tZYmVp8iLgTNeSuRRt94knPiIGJvVEIawKbU i6oFdeB63pXHwQUPul5AEs5hn6+yOyIln/DdSmO4FeWIMXA8BX8+E8tz2VYJ2AoG IPk13BCKpiPdKU0FBiK3Bre3908Gdu4laI0LnLIdJ9uTQry06ctvl061EebCopJO 130KIyao9BVMnc7rmO/h0Qu4bCGxkU5tq5kzeXkBSAvi8FUQ6Rs6FJ0aR7jPMMUi LiLrz2T8qmI1JsIQEIocOu9waWYGe+CK5nLLDbi6933u8dcKGsWNi4umxNURxV/m WLePoIRQN8ImJT6/K4mog+99cjOARbdq4lXQfNV/FRaTRZT/53EFgn7OKabcRcde ifW04kzCy5kX8SnJhovxggR8DHqBMZz0Uq5s1/c49n4sVeIqAkMaK9rBeWuvUn/C makUvW8Lq7/pKVa2rhZQNycVFThHmwbWFmuR4yIBJmxo8XjyoPtNlCE3OdGx1OYR nNAr7J676gk= =no6b -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----