From: Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx>
To: Al Viro <viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Restrict procfs permissions
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 20:18:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41FBE18B.2010105@lsrfire.ath.cx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050129044109.GR8859@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>
Al Viro wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 03:45:42AM +0100, Rene Scharfe wrote:
>
>> The patch is inspired by the /proc restriction parts of the
>> GrSecurity patch. The main difference is the ability to configure
>> the restrictions dynamically. You can change the umask setting by
>> running
>>
>> # mount -o remount,umask=007 /proc
>>
>> Testing has been *very* light so far -- it compiles and boots.
>> Patch is against 2.6.11-rc2-bk6.
>>
>> Comments are very welcome.
>
>
> It leaves already existing inodes with whatever mode they used to
> have.
I said "configure the restrictions dynamically" but I meant "doesn't
need a recompile to change settings". I expect the umask to be
specified in /etc/fstab and rarely changed in a running system. With
that in mind I think the patch is useful as-is, especially because it's
so small. But I agree, that thing is a dirty hack. :]
> _IF_ you want to do that sort of things, do it right - add
> ->permission() that would apply that umask before checks and if you
> want it to be seen in results of stat(2) - add ->gettattr() and do
> the same there.
Aww, that sounds expensive. My favourite solution would be to only
allow the umask to be changed at mount time, not when remounting.
Calling parse_options from proc_fill_super, only and not from
proc_remount does not help very much because proc_fill_super is only
called at boot (or proc module load time). Is there another way?
While we are here: how would one change the uid or gid parameter? With a
built-in proc fs the mount -a -t proc in the init scripts only results
in a proc_remount call which (in mainline) doesn't bother looking at
parameters at all. The same is true for a unmount, mount sequence.
Thanks,
Rene
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-29 19:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-29 2:45 [PATCH] Restrict procfs permissions Rene Scharfe
2005-01-29 4:41 ` Al Viro
2005-01-29 19:18 ` Rene Scharfe [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41FBE18B.2010105@lsrfire.ath.cx \
--to=rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.