All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Obster <kernel@obster.org>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.4.29: strange behaviour system clock
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 23:10:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <41FD5B72.1060806@obster.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41FD336B.8050007@bluewin.ch>

Hi,

I have also seen such offsets on some boxes running at EADS (a Compaq 
Proliant [<-- this one has a very small offset] and a no name machine 
[<-- this one is terrible in 10 minutes 2-3 minutes too fast]). I have 
no numbers at the moment.
If you need some more information please contact me.

I tried to fix this issue also, but haven't found any solution. Both 
servers are running SuSE Linux I think on 8.x (2.4 kernel). I don't know 
at the moment if we tried already an update to 2.6 kernel.

For the moment our fix is a 10 minute cronjob which execute
hwclock --hctosys
because hardware clock is running correct.

A fix or a hint whats wrong would be very nice :-).

Cheers,
Michael Obster
---
mailto:michael@obster.org
http://www.obster.org

Mario Vanoni wrote:
> the same with
> 2.4.29-rc[123]
> 2.4.28-lck1
> 2.4.23-aa3
> every time repeatable
> 
> UP P4-3400HT, 2GB mem, no swap
> IDE NEC DVD-RW ND-3500AG (dev/sr0)
> 
> DVD with 48 files (*.tar.bz2), 4.4GB
> 
> ntpdate -b swisstime.ethz.ch: offset 0.0...
> time dircmp /mnt/cdrom /source
> thinks it used 20 minutes, no errors
> ntpdate -b ...: offset 1134 sec !!!
> 
> SMP dual P3-550, 1GB mem, no swap
> SCSI PIONER DVD-ROM DVD-304 (slot-in, /dev/sr0)
> 
> same DVD, identical source (copied)
> 
> ntpdate -b ...: offset 0.0...
> time dircmp /mnt/cdrom /source
> thinks it used 12 minutes, no errors
> ntpdate -b ...: 0.020522 sec
> 
> SMP dual Xeon-2800HT, 2GB mem, no swap
> IDE NEC DVD-RW ND-2501A (/dev/sr0)
> 
> same deviation, offset tons of seconds
> this is the production, time must remain correct
> 
> Burning CD/DVD with IDE burners,
> there not exist SCSI burners,
> similar retards of the system clock.
> CD using cdrecord, DVD growisofs.
> 
> Doing hwclock --show, time is always correct.
> 
> Not in LKML, cc if you need, and ... thanks
> 
> Mario
> 
> PS We burn DVD only since 2 weeks,
>   before only CD and only on the SCSI machine,
>   and ... NO PROBLEM.
> 


      reply	other threads:[~2005-01-30 22:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-01-30 19:20 2.4.29: strange behaviour system clock Mario Vanoni
2005-01-30 22:10 ` Michael Obster [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=41FD5B72.1060806@obster.org \
    --to=kernel@obster.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.