Re: [PATHC] Relaxed syntax for the processor PBLK length

[Richard Dawe <rich-fbHbV8X007REJxKfswctSdBc4/FLrbF6@public.gmane.org>]

Hello.

Eric Piel wrote:
[snip]
> --- linux-2.6.11-rc2/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c.orig	2005-01-23 01:24:55.315650055 +0100
> +++ linux-2.6.11-rc2/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c	2005-01-23 01:27:32.016020121 +0100
> @@ -492,9 +492,16 @@ acpi_processor_get_info (
>  	if (!object.processor.pblk_address)
>  		ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO, "No PBLK (NULL address)\n"));
>  	else if (object.processor.pblk_length != 6)
> -		ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_ERROR, "Invalid PBLK length [%d]\n",
> -			object.processor.pblk_length));
> -	else {
> +		if (object.processor.pblk_length == 5 && !acpi_strict) {
> +			printk(KERN_INFO PREFIX 
> +				"PBLK length is 5 instead of 6, concidering "
> +				"it is good anyway.\n");
[snip]

Typo: concidering -> considering

Bye, Rich =]

-- 
Richard Dawe [ http://homepages.nildram.co.uk/~phekda/richdawe/ ]

"You can't evaluate a man by logic alone."
   -- McCoy, "I, Mudd", Star Trek


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time
by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl