From: Steve Dickson <SteveD@redhat.com>
To: mehta kiran <kiranmehta1981@yahoo.com>
Cc: "Aswathanarayana, Chetan (STSD)" <chetan.aswathanarayana@hp.com>,
nfs@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: lockd grace period
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 11:01:05 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41FE5641.2060707@RedHat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050131150955.81041.qmail@web51610.mail.yahoo.com>
mehta kiran wrote:
>Hi ,
> lockd can run alone if this machine also acts
>as nfs client of some other (third machine)
>Clients side only require lockd and rpciod , right
>
>
hmm... I always think of lockd being a server only process...
but indeed it is started for callbacks and reclaims on the client side so
so point taken... I guess what threw me was the idea of lockd
running "alone".... lockd never runs along (i.e. w/out
some type of NFS activity)....
So your question is, when there is already an active NFS mount
(which would bring up lockd()) and then NFS server is started
will lockd() have a grace period. From what I see the answer
is no. Probably because the its expected that the server will
be started before any NFS would occur which does occur
99% of the time....
steved.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time
by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-31 15:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-31 12:50 lockd grace period Aswathanarayana, Chetan (STSD)
2005-01-31 14:36 ` mehta kiran
2005-01-31 15:01 ` Steve Dickson
2005-01-31 15:09 ` mehta kiran
2005-01-31 16:01 ` Steve Dickson [this message]
2005-01-31 14:58 ` Steve Dickson
2005-01-31 15:01 ` mehta kiran
2005-01-31 23:07 ` Dan Stromberg
2005-01-31 23:57 ` Trond Myklebust
2005-02-01 3:07 ` Steve Dickson
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-02-01 10:46 mehta kiran
2005-01-31 7:41 mehta kiran
2005-01-31 12:33 ` Steve Dickson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41FE5641.2060707@RedHat.com \
--to=steved@redhat.com \
--cc=chetan.aswathanarayana@hp.com \
--cc=kiranmehta1981@yahoo.com \
--cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.