From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Goodman Subject: Re: Oops on flock on NFS3 krb5 mount Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 10:55:43 -0800 Message-ID: <41FE7F2F.209@csua.berkeley.edu> References: <41F9FB44.9060002@csua.berkeley.edu> <1107029039.11814.32.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.11] helo=sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1CvgiI-0006Uj-U9 for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 31 Jan 2005 10:55:54 -0800 Received: from soda.csua.berkeley.edu ([128.32.112.233] ident=[h9K9qjfbznAPQjjs7clSBP5hztu/LS7P]) by sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.41) id 1CvgiH-00030D-84 for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 31 Jan 2005 10:55:54 -0800 To: Trond Myklebust In-Reply-To: <1107029039.11814.32.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Yes, it fixes it. Mark Trond Myklebust wrote: >Hi Mark, > >Does the following patch help? AFAIK, we should not be using RPCSEC_GSS >against NLM servers if we want to be able to interoperate with other >implementations. > >I've been told that Solaris will, for instance, only use AUTH_SYS for >locking. > >Cheers, > Trond > > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs