From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <41FF84EB.3000802@gmx.net>
Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2005 14:32:27 +0100
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Marc_M=FCller?= <marc.muller@gmx.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Bridge] bridge nf vs. 2.4.29
List-Id: Linux Ethernet Bridging  <bridge.lists.osdl.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge>,
	<mailto:bridge-request@lists.osdl.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.osdl.org/pipermail/bridge>
List-Post: <mailto:bridge@lists.osdl.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bridge-request@lists.osdl.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge>,
	<mailto:bridge-request@lists.osdl.org?subject=subscribe>
To: bridge@lists.osdl.org

Hello List,

Are there any known issues in using the bridge-nf patch for kernel
v2.4.28 against 2.4.29 or can it be used in production environments? is
there already an adopted version of the patch for 2.4.29?
Sorry if this question has already been answered elsewhere (I didn't
find something useful on google, cvs and the list).

Thanks, Marc