All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: xiujianfeng <xiujianfeng@huawei.com>
To: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
	<muchun.song@linux.dev>, <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	<cgroups@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] memcg: don't handle event_list for v2 when offlining
Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 10:47:07 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <41fdf6cb-ec1b-ff07-44f4-3ba01b45ebda@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZkOBaNffNi4rmR8h@P9FQF9L96D>



On 2024/5/14 23:21, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 04:09:58PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
>> On Tue 14-05-24 13:11:06, Xiu Jianfeng wrote:
>>> The event_list for memcg is only valid for v1 and not used for v2,
>>> so it's unnessesary to handle event_list for v2.
>>
>> You are right but the code as is works just fine. The list will be
>> empty. It is true that we do not need to take event_list_lock lock but
>> nobody should be using this lock anyway. Also the offline callback is
>> not particularly hot path. So why do we want to change the code?
> 
> +1 to that.
> 
> Plus this code will be moved to a separate function in mm/memcontrol-v1.c
> and luckily can be compiled out entirely for users who don't need the
> cgroup v1 support.

I found the patchset you mentioned, Thanks.

> 
> Thanks!

  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-15  2:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-14 13:11 [PATCH -next] memcg: don't handle event_list for v2 when offlining Xiu Jianfeng
2024-05-14 14:09 ` Michal Hocko
2024-05-14 15:21   ` Roman Gushchin
2024-05-15  2:47     ` xiujianfeng [this message]
2024-05-15  2:45   ` xiujianfeng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=41fdf6cb-ec1b-ff07-44f4-3ba01b45ebda@huawei.com \
    --to=xiujianfeng@huawei.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.