From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: ip_queue.c inefficiencies? Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 16:18:04 +0100 Message-ID: <4200EF2C.1030808@trash.net> References: <6.2.0.14.2.20050118185904.047393e0@pop.mindspring.com> <20050201131128.GF6878@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org, Michael StJohns To: Harald Welte In-Reply-To: <20050201131128.GF6878@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Harald Welte wrote: >On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 07:18:32PM -0500, Michael StJohns wrote: > >>The patch below does two things: It adds some /proc visible counters to >>count the packets dropped because they couldn't be queued to either kernel >>or user space; it adds a check early on in ipq_enqueue_packet to check and >>see if the kernel queue is full before trying to send the packet to user >>space. >> > >I think your patch is perfectly valid and looks fine. > >Patrick, if you don't see any problems, could you add it to your queue >of pending patches? Thanks! > The patch doesn't apply to current -bk. Michael, can you please send a new patch against the latest -bk kernel ? Regards Patrick