From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com,
Netfilter-devel <netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org>,
Martin Josefsson <gandalf@wlug.westbo.se>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Reduce netfilter memory use on MP systems
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 19:13:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4203BB4E.3070908@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050204175134.GD2737@wotan.suse.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 505 bytes --]
Andi Kleen wrote:
>The main motivation is actually not to save the memory (that's just
>a useful side effect), but increase the max limit on 64bit systems.
>Fixing it fully will require fixing vmalloc of course, but it already
>help. Without it you can't get more than ~3800 rules
>on a 64bit system with NR_CPUS==128 and 128 byte cache lines.
>
Thanks Andi, I've added the patch to my 2.6.12 tree. I've also made the
same change in arp_tables, ip6_tables and ebtables for consistency.
Regards
Patrick
[-- Attachment #2: x --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 5343 bytes --]
===== net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c 1.17 vs edited =====
--- 1.17/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c 2004-11-24 08:46:46 +01:00
+++ edited/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c 2005-02-04 19:03:01 +01:00
@@ -822,10 +822,10 @@
/* this will get free'd in do_replace()/ebt_register_table()
if an error occurs */
newinfo->chainstack = (struct ebt_chainstack **)
- vmalloc(NR_CPUS * sizeof(struct ebt_chainstack));
+ vmalloc(num_possible_cpus() * sizeof(struct ebt_chainstack));
if (!newinfo->chainstack)
return -ENOMEM;
- for (i = 0; i < NR_CPUS; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < num_possible_cpus(); i++) {
newinfo->chainstack[i] =
vmalloc(udc_cnt * sizeof(struct ebt_chainstack));
if (!newinfo->chainstack[i]) {
@@ -898,7 +898,7 @@
memcpy(counters, oldcounters,
sizeof(struct ebt_counter) * nentries);
/* add other counters to those of cpu 0 */
- for (cpu = 1; cpu < NR_CPUS; cpu++) {
+ for (cpu = 1; cpu < num_possible_cpus(); cpu++) {
counter_base = COUNTER_BASE(oldcounters, nentries, cpu);
for (i = 0; i < nentries; i++) {
counters[i].pcnt += counter_base[i].pcnt;
@@ -930,7 +930,7 @@
BUGPRINT("Entries_size never zero\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
- countersize = COUNTER_OFFSET(tmp.nentries) * NR_CPUS;
+ countersize = COUNTER_OFFSET(tmp.nentries) * num_possible_cpus();
newinfo = (struct ebt_table_info *)
vmalloc(sizeof(struct ebt_table_info) + countersize);
if (!newinfo)
@@ -1023,7 +1023,7 @@
vfree(table->entries);
if (table->chainstack) {
- for (i = 0; i < NR_CPUS; i++)
+ for (i = 0; i < num_possible_cpus(); i++)
vfree(table->chainstack[i]);
vfree(table->chainstack);
}
@@ -1043,7 +1043,7 @@
vfree(counterstmp);
/* can be initialized in translate_table() */
if (newinfo->chainstack) {
- for (i = 0; i < NR_CPUS; i++)
+ for (i = 0; i < num_possible_cpus(); i++)
vfree(newinfo->chainstack[i]);
vfree(newinfo->chainstack);
}
@@ -1137,7 +1137,7 @@
return -EINVAL;
}
- countersize = COUNTER_OFFSET(table->table->nentries) * NR_CPUS;
+ countersize = COUNTER_OFFSET(table->table->nentries) * num_possible_cpus();
newinfo = (struct ebt_table_info *)
vmalloc(sizeof(struct ebt_table_info) + countersize);
ret = -ENOMEM;
@@ -1191,7 +1191,7 @@
up(&ebt_mutex);
free_chainstack:
if (newinfo->chainstack) {
- for (i = 0; i < NR_CPUS; i++)
+ for (i = 0; i < num_possible_cpus(); i++)
vfree(newinfo->chainstack[i]);
vfree(newinfo->chainstack);
}
@@ -1215,7 +1215,7 @@
if (table->private->entries)
vfree(table->private->entries);
if (table->private->chainstack) {
- for (i = 0; i < NR_CPUS; i++)
+ for (i = 0; i < num_possible_cpus(); i++)
vfree(table->private->chainstack[i]);
vfree(table->private->chainstack);
}
===== net/ipv4/netfilter/arp_tables.c 1.23 vs edited =====
--- 1.23/net/ipv4/netfilter/arp_tables.c 2005-01-11 03:45:54 +01:00
+++ edited/net/ipv4/netfilter/arp_tables.c 2005-02-04 19:01:20 +01:00
@@ -717,7 +717,7 @@
}
/* And one copy for every other CPU */
- for (i = 1; i < NR_CPUS; i++) {
+ for (i = 1; i < num_possible_cpus(); i++) {
memcpy(newinfo->entries + SMP_ALIGN(newinfo->size)*i,
newinfo->entries,
SMP_ALIGN(newinfo->size));
@@ -768,7 +768,7 @@
unsigned int cpu;
unsigned int i;
- for (cpu = 0; cpu < NR_CPUS; cpu++) {
+ for (cpu = 0; cpu < num_possible_cpus(); cpu++) {
i = 0;
ARPT_ENTRY_ITERATE(t->entries + TABLE_OFFSET(t, cpu),
t->size,
@@ -886,7 +886,7 @@
return -ENOMEM;
newinfo = vmalloc(sizeof(struct arpt_table_info)
- + SMP_ALIGN(tmp.size) * NR_CPUS);
+ + SMP_ALIGN(tmp.size) * num_possible_cpus());
if (!newinfo)
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -1159,7 +1159,7 @@
= { 0, 0, 0, { 0 }, { 0 }, { } };
newinfo = vmalloc(sizeof(struct arpt_table_info)
- + SMP_ALIGN(repl->size) * NR_CPUS);
+ + SMP_ALIGN(repl->size) * num_possible_cpus());
if (!newinfo) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
return ret;
===== net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6_tables.c 1.39 vs edited =====
--- 1.39/net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6_tables.c 2005-01-11 03:45:54 +01:00
+++ edited/net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6_tables.c 2005-02-04 19:01:55 +01:00
@@ -952,7 +952,7 @@
}
/* And one copy for every other CPU */
- for (i = 1; i < NR_CPUS; i++) {
+ for (i = 1; i < num_possible_cpus(); i++) {
memcpy(newinfo->entries + SMP_ALIGN(newinfo->size)*i,
newinfo->entries,
SMP_ALIGN(newinfo->size));
@@ -974,7 +974,7 @@
struct ip6t_entry *table_base;
unsigned int i;
- for (i = 0; i < NR_CPUS; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < num_possible_cpus(); i++) {
table_base =
(void *)newinfo->entries
+ TABLE_OFFSET(newinfo, i);
@@ -1021,7 +1021,7 @@
unsigned int cpu;
unsigned int i;
- for (cpu = 0; cpu < NR_CPUS; cpu++) {
+ for (cpu = 0; cpu < num_possible_cpus(); cpu++) {
i = 0;
IP6T_ENTRY_ITERATE(t->entries + TABLE_OFFSET(t, cpu),
t->size,
@@ -1155,7 +1155,7 @@
return -ENOMEM;
newinfo = vmalloc(sizeof(struct ip6t_table_info)
- + SMP_ALIGN(tmp.size) * NR_CPUS);
+ + SMP_ALIGN(tmp.size) * num_possible_cpus());
if (!newinfo)
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -1469,7 +1469,7 @@
= { 0, 0, 0, { 0 }, { 0 }, { } };
newinfo = vmalloc(sizeof(struct ip6t_table_info)
- + SMP_ALIGN(repl->size) * NR_CPUS);
+ + SMP_ALIGN(repl->size) * num_possible_cpus());
if (!newinfo)
return -ENOMEM;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-04 18:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-04 14:09 [PATCH] Reduce netfilter memory use on MP systems Andi Kleen
2005-02-04 17:34 ` Martin Josefsson
2005-02-04 17:51 ` Andi Kleen
2005-02-04 18:13 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2005-02-07 18:31 ` Harald Welte
2005-02-07 19:10 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4203BB4E.3070908@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=gandalf@wlug.westbo.se \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.