From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ramana <ramana@intraperson.com>
Subject: Re: unacceptable bug in autofs kernel module
Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2005 19:16:56 +0530
Message-ID: <4204CE50.9090803@intraperson.com>
References: <200502040038.j140ck99006468@cornholio.qualcomm.com>	<Pine.LNX.4.58.0502040948330.21690@wombat.indigo.net.au>
	<4202E526.50304@intraperson.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <4202E526.50304@intraperson.com>
List-Id: <autofs.vger.kernel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs>,
	<mailto:autofs-request@linux.kernel.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://linux.kernel.org/pipermail/autofs>
List-Post: <mailto:autofs@linux.kernel.org>
List-Help: <mailto:autofs-request@linux.kernel.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs>,
	<mailto:autofs-request@linux.kernel.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: autofs-bounces@linux.kernel.org
Errors-To: autofs-bounces@linux.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
To: autofs@linux.kernel.org
Cc: mmarion@qualcomm.com, Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>


> I moved latest version Autodir to autofs 4 kernel module and so far 
> all stress tests tell me autofs4 protocol is performing well without 
> these ENOENT errors. I have to do little bit more tests before 
> concluding anything as final.
>
> For more details check http://www.intraperson.com/autodir/.
> DVersion: Autodir 0.93.0 and above.
>
Recent tests done under little loaded machine, show me this problem 
still exist even in autofs4 kernel module.

Regards
ramana

-- 
http://www.intraperson.com