All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Inki Dae <daeinki@gmail.com>
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>,
	Seung-Woo Kim <sw0312.kim@samsung.com>,
	DRI mailing list <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm: exynos: Perform initialization/cleanup at probe/remove time
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2016 00:12:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4205210.BZzHJHFGsf@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAQKjZOt517fVhWvwQn3BN7ycavfWCyciitowam7LOF=hnotMA@mail.gmail.com>

Hello Inki,

On Saturday 17 Dec 2016 09:33:31 Inki Dae wrote:
> HI,
> 
> Thanks for patch. Reasonable to me and go to misc excepting below one thing.
> Please check my comment.
> 
> 2016-12-14 4:34 GMT+09:00 Laurent Pinchart:
> > From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
> > 
> > The drm driver .load() operation is prone to race conditions as it
> > initializes the driver after registering the device nodes. Its usage is
> > deprecated, inline it in the probe function and call drm_dev_alloc() and
> > drm_dev_register() explicitly.
> > 
> > For consistency inline the .unload() handler in the remove function as
> > well.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
> > ---
> > 
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp.c       |   1 -
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dpi.c  |   1 -
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.c  | 245 ++++++++++++-------------
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c  |   1 -
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_vidi.c |   1 -
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_hdmi.c     |   1 -
> >  6 files changed, 127 insertions(+), 123 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp.c index 528229faffe4..b839f065f4b3
> > 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp.c
> > @@ -102,7 +102,6 @@ static int exynos_dp_bridge_attach(struct
> > analogix_dp_plat_data *plat_data,> 
> >         struct drm_encoder *encoder = &dp->encoder;
> >         int ret;
> > 
> > -       drm_connector_register(connector);
> 
> You removed above function from encoder and connector drivers.Is
> removing this required?
> And is this related to this patch? If not so, it seems this change
> should go to another patch with the reason to remove this function
> call.

When using the .load() callback, driver initialization is performed from 
drm_dev_register() after the DRM device gets registered with sysfs. With this 
patch driver initialization is moved before drm_dev_register(), and 
registering connectors manually would then trigger a WARN due to the sysfs 
parent not being registered yet.

The connectors are registered by the DRM core (drm_modeset_register_all() 
called from drm_dev_register()), so there's no need to register them manually 
after drm_dev_register(), we can just drop that code.

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2016-12-17 22:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-13 19:34 [PATCH 0/2] exynosdrm: Remove .load/.unload midlayer Laurent Pinchart
2016-12-13 19:34 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm: exynos: Perform initialization/cleanup at probe/remove time Laurent Pinchart
2016-12-13 21:03   ` Sean Paul
2016-12-13 21:10   ` Daniel Vetter
2016-12-13 21:30     ` Laurent Pinchart
2016-12-13 21:32       ` Sean Paul
2016-12-13 21:49         ` Daniel Vetter
2016-12-13 21:54           ` Laurent Pinchart
2016-12-16 18:02   ` Daniel Stone
2016-12-17 21:49     ` Laurent Pinchart
2016-12-17  0:33   ` Inki Dae
2016-12-17 22:12     ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2016-12-19  6:32       ` Inki Dae
2016-12-17 22:29   ` [PATCH v2] " Laurent Pinchart
2016-12-19  9:29     ` Daniel Stone
2016-12-13 19:34 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm: Remove unused drm_platform midlayer Laurent Pinchart
2016-12-13 21:03   ` Daniel Vetter
2016-12-13 21:04     ` Sean Paul
2016-12-17 22:39 ` [PATCH] drm: Remove the struct drm_device platformdev field Laurent Pinchart
2016-12-18 13:16   ` Daniel Vetter
2016-12-18 20:24     ` Laurent Pinchart
2016-12-19  8:30   ` Jyri Sarha
2017-01-03 13:49   ` Vincent ABRIOU
2017-01-03 14:00   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-01-03 15:29   ` Rob Clark
2017-01-04  1:22   ` Xinwei Kong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4205210.BZzHJHFGsf@avalon \
    --to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=daeinki@gmail.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
    --cc=laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=sw0312.kim@samsung.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.