From: Daniel Drake <dsd@gentoo.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.11-rc3: Kylix application no longer works?
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 00:03:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <420801D7.3020405@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050207145100.6208b8b9.akpm@osdl.org>
Andrew Morton wrote:
> I wonder if reverting the patch will restore the old behaviour?
>
> # This is a BitKeeper generated diff -Nru style patch.
> #
> # ChangeSet
> # 2005/01/21 13:42:18-08:00 davem@nuts.davemloft.net
> # Merge nuts.davemloft.net:/disk1/BK/sparcwork-2.6
> # into nuts.davemloft.net:/disk1/BK/sparc-2.6
> #
> # fs/binfmt_elf.c
> # 2005/01/21 13:42:06-08:00 davem@nuts.davemloft.net +0 -0
> # Auto merged
> #
> # ChangeSet
> # 2005/01/17 13:38:38-08:00 ecd@skynet.be
> # [SPARC64]: Missing user access return value checks in fs/binfmt_elf.c and fs/compat.c
> #
> # Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
> #
> # fs/compat_ioctl.c
> # 2005/01/17 13:37:56-08:00 ecd@skynet.be +12 -5
> # [SPARC64]: Missing user access return value checks in fs/binfmt_elf.c and fs/compat.c
> #
> # fs/binfmt_elf.c
> # 2005/01/17 13:37:56-08:00 ecd@skynet.be +43 -19
> # [SPARC64]: Missing user access return value checks in fs/binfmt_elf.c and fs/compat.c
> #
I think so. For a short period we applied this patch to the Gentoo 2.6.10
kernel...
http://dev.gentoo.org/~dsd/gentoo-dev-sources/release-10.01/dist/1900_umem_catch.patch
...but removed it once users complained it stopped kylix binaries from running.
Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-07 23:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-07 22:11 2.6.11-rc3: Kylix application no longer works? Pavel Machek
2005-02-07 22:51 ` Andrew Morton
2005-02-08 0:03 ` Daniel Drake [this message]
2005-02-08 0:18 ` Andrew Morton
2005-02-08 0:56 ` Grzegorz Kulewski
2005-02-08 4:06 ` Andrew Morton
2005-02-08 17:13 ` Pavel Machek
2005-02-08 8:15 ` Daniel Drake
2005-02-08 17:27 ` Pavel Machek
2005-02-08 17:51 ` Pavel Machek
2005-02-08 19:16 ` Stephen Hemminger
2005-02-09 2:10 ` Andrew Morton
2005-02-09 11:11 ` Pavel Machek
2005-02-09 15:34 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-02-09 20:13 ` Rik van Riel
2005-02-12 0:39 ` Ingo Oeser
2005-02-08 20:43 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-02-08 22:27 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=420801D7.3020405@gentoo.org \
--to=dsd@gentoo.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.