[Fwd: Re: sata_sil problems (lockup at boottime)]

[Doug McLain <nostar@comcast.net>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 333 bytes --]

Any word on this? It's been reported here a few times now.

I am having exactly the same problem, the only difference being the 
model of drive.  Mine is a WD2000.  The sata_sil module loads ok though, 
if the drive is not connected.  If it is connected, hard lock.  Tested 
on 2.4.25, 2.6.9, 2.6.10.

Doug

-- 
http://nostar.net/



[-- Attachment #2: Re: sata_sil problems (lockup at boottime).eml.eml --]
[-- Type: message/rfc822, Size: 5682 bytes --]

From: Doug McLain <nostar@comcast.net>
To: Gerald Hopf <gerald.hopf@nv-systems.net>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: sata_sil problems (lockup at boottime)
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 10:34:32 -0500
Message-ID: <41E2A088.8090802@comcast.net>

Gerald Hopf wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> 
> i'm having some really strange problems with the sata_sil driver.
> 
> My hardware:
> Asus A7N8X Deluxe Rev 1.x with onboard Sil3112 Controller
> - Samsung SP1614C SATA Harddrive
> - for further testing : PATA to SATA Adapter that came with an ABIT 
> Mainboard
> 
> What i'm trying to accomplish: i'm trying to use this Samsung SATA 
> harddrive in my Linux Fileserver:
> 
> When the Silicon Image Controller is enabled (it can be disabled by a 
> jumper) and no harddrive is connected, everything boots fine.
> If i connect a harddrive, i get the following message (exact messages 
> change slightly) while booting:
> 
> - - - - -  START  - - - - -
> ======================
> [<c0102716>] common_interrupt+0x1a/0x20
> [<c0117d70>] __do_softirq+0x30/0x90
> [<c0104261>] do_softirq+0x41/0x50
> ======================
> [<c012d0a4>] irq_exit+0x34/0x40
> [<c0104165>] do_IRQ+9x45/0x60
> [<c0102716>] common_interrupt+0x1a/0x20
> [<c010c674>] delay_tsc+0x14/0x20
> [<c025efd2>] __delay+0x12/0x20
> [<c02d7290>] ata_pio_complet+0xe0/0x1f0
> [<c02d7a95>] ata_pio_test+0x95/0xb0
> [<c01229bc>] worker_thread+0x1cc/0x290
> [<c02d7a00>] ata_pio_task+0x0/0xb0
> [<c0110160>] default_wake_function+0x0/0x20
> [<c0110160>] default_wake_function+0x0/0x20
> [<c01227f0>] worker_thread+0x0/0x290
> [<c0126ca5>] kthread+0xa5/0xb0
> [<c0126c00>] kthread+0x0/0xb0
> [<c01006f1>] kernel_thread_helper+0x5/0x14
> handlers:
> [<c02d82b0>] (ata_interrupt+0x0/0x1c0)
> Disabling IRQ #11
> ata: dev 0 ATA, max UDMA/100, 361882080 sectors: lba 48
> _
> - - - - -  END - - - - -
> 
> This happens with both the Samsung SP1614C "native" SATA drive, as well 
> as with an IBM 180GB PATA drive, using a PATA-to-SATA Adapter.
> So i'm not sure whether this is harddrive dependent, but at least it 
> doesn't look like it...
> 
> This problem has been there in all of the latest 2.6.X kernel revisions. 
> I'm currently using 2.6.10-rc3 (which came out today), but i've allready 
> had this problem in 2.6.9 and 2.6.8 and probably even 2.6.7 if i 
> remember correctly.
> 
> I tried quite a lot to get rid of those problems, including:
> - Flashing a new/different Bios (even with different versions of the 
> Silicon Image SATA Bios part: 4.2.47 and 4.2.50)
> - Disabling APIC in the Bios, compiling Kernel with or without APIC
> - Changing the IRQ of the Controller by reserving IRQ#11 in the Bios
> - Disabling allmost every other onboard device i could, including 
> serial/parallel/usb/firewire/3com lan (and there are no PCI/Addon cards 
> besides an nvidia geforce2mx agp card installed in this pc anyway!)
> - Connecting drives to both ports
> 
> I found the following discussions which might be related to what i'm 
> experiencing, but noone seems to have a solution. Some seem to suggest 
> it worked fine till 2.6.5:
> (The first two seem to be most related, i'm not so sure of the third one)
> http://www.fedoraforum.org/forum/archive/index.php/t-26543.html
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=128180
> http://www.fedoraforum.org/forum/archive/index.php/t-23028.html
> 
> Screenshots of the error messages can be found here:
> http://www.nv-systems.net/pics/lkml/sata_sil1.jpg <-- the one from above
> http://www.nv-systems.net/pics/lkml/sata_sil2.jpg <-- with samsung 
> instead of ibm
> http://www.nv-systems.net/pics/lkml/sata_sil3.jpg <-- the screen just 
> before the problem
> 
> Is there ANYTHING i can do (except buying a promise controller) ?
> 
> Yours sincerely,
>                     Gerald

I am having exactly the same problem, the only difference being the 
model of drive.  Mine is a WD2000.  The sata_sil module loads ok though, 
if the drive is not connected.  If it is connected, hard lock.  Tested 
on 2.4.25, 2.6.9, 2.6.10.

Doug

-- 
http://nostar.net/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/