All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Mark F. Haigh" <Mark.Haigh@spirentcom.com>
To: gregkh@suse.de
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2.6.11-rc3-bk4] arch/i386/kernel/pci/irq.c:  Wrong message output
Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 21:06:18 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <420848CA.2030008@spirentcom.com> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 725 bytes --]


(Same basic problem I just reported in a seperate thread against 2.4.29-bk8)

The following has been reported in the wild for kernel 2.6.8-24:

PCI: Enabling device 0000:00:05.0 (0000 -> 0002)
PCI: No IRQ known for interrupt pin @ of device 0000:00:05.0. Probably 
buggy MP table.

It should read "No IRQ known for interrupt pin A", but the 'pin' 
variable has already been decremented (from 1 to 0), so the line:

printk(KERN_WARNING "PCI: No IRQ known for interrupt pin %c of device 
%s.%s\n", 'A' + pin - 1, dev->slot_name, msg);

causes "pin @" to be output, because 'A' + 0 - 1 == '@'.

The supplied patch should fix it.  It also removes a redundant check for 
a nonzero pin.


Mark F. Haigh
Mark.Haigh@spirentcom.com


[-- Attachment #2: pci-irq-patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3338 bytes --]

--- arch/i386/pci/irq.c.orig	2005-02-07 20:40:58.140856536 -0800
+++ arch/i386/pci/irq.c	2005-02-07 20:46:06.713946296 -0800
@@ -1031,56 +1031,55 @@
 
 	pci_read_config_byte(dev, PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN, &pin);
 	if (pin && !pcibios_lookup_irq(dev, 1) && !dev->irq) {
-		char *msg;
-		msg = "";
+		char *msg = "";
+
+		pin--;		/* interrupt pins are numbered starting from 1 */
+
 		if (io_apic_assign_pci_irqs) {
 			int irq;
 
-			if (pin) {
-				pin--;		/* interrupt pins are numbered starting from 1 */
-				irq = IO_APIC_get_PCI_irq_vector(dev->bus->number, PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn), pin);
-				/*
-				 * Busses behind bridges are typically not listed in the MP-table.
-				 * In this case we have to look up the IRQ based on the parent bus,
-				 * parent slot, and pin number. The SMP code detects such bridged
-				 * busses itself so we should get into this branch reliably.
-				 */
-				temp_dev = dev;
-				while (irq < 0 && dev->bus->parent) { /* go back to the bridge */
-					struct pci_dev * bridge = dev->bus->self;
-
-					pin = (pin + PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn)) % 4;
-					irq = IO_APIC_get_PCI_irq_vector(bridge->bus->number, 
-							PCI_SLOT(bridge->devfn), pin);
-					if (irq >= 0)
-						printk(KERN_WARNING "PCI: using PPB %s[%c] to get irq %d\n",
-							pci_name(bridge), 'A' + pin, irq);
-					dev = bridge;
-				}
-				dev = temp_dev;
-				if (irq >= 0) {
+			irq = IO_APIC_get_PCI_irq_vector(dev->bus->number, PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn), pin);
+			/*
+			 * Busses behind bridges are typically not listed in the MP-table.
+			 * In this case we have to look up the IRQ based on the parent bus,
+			 * parent slot, and pin number. The SMP code detects such bridged
+			 * busses itself so we should get into this branch reliably.
+			 */
+			temp_dev = dev;
+			while (irq < 0 && dev->bus->parent) { /* go back to the bridge */
+				struct pci_dev * bridge = dev->bus->self;
+
+				pin = (pin + PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn)) % 4;
+				irq = IO_APIC_get_PCI_irq_vector(bridge->bus->number, 
+						PCI_SLOT(bridge->devfn), pin);
+				if (irq >= 0)
+					printk(KERN_WARNING "PCI: using PPB %s[%c] to get irq %d\n",
+						pci_name(bridge), 'A' + pin, irq);
+				dev = bridge;
+			}
+			dev = temp_dev;
+			if (irq >= 0) {
 #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI
-					if (!platform_legacy_irq(irq))
-						irq = IO_APIC_VECTOR(irq);
+				if (!platform_legacy_irq(irq))
+					irq = IO_APIC_VECTOR(irq);
 #endif
-					printk(KERN_INFO "PCI->APIC IRQ transform: %s[%c] -> IRQ %d\n",
-						pci_name(dev), 'A' + pin, irq);
-					dev->irq = irq;
-					return 0;
-				} else
-					msg = " Probably buggy MP table.";
-			}
+				printk(KERN_INFO "PCI->APIC IRQ transform: %s[%c] -> IRQ %d\n",
+					pci_name(dev), 'A' + pin, irq);
+				dev->irq = irq;
+				return 0;
+			} else
+				msg = " Probably buggy MP table.";
 		} else if (pci_probe & PCI_BIOS_IRQ_SCAN)
 			msg = "";
 		else
 			msg = " Please try using pci=biosirq.";
-			
+
 		/* With IDE legacy devices the IRQ lookup failure is not a problem.. */
 		if (dev->class >> 8 == PCI_CLASS_STORAGE_IDE && !(dev->class & 0x5))
 			return 0;
-			
+
 		printk(KERN_WARNING "PCI: No IRQ known for interrupt pin %c of device %s.%s\n",
-		       'A' + pin - 1, pci_name(dev), msg);
+		       'A' + pin, pci_name(dev), msg);
 	}
 	/* VIA bridges use interrupt line for apic/pci steering across
 	   the V-Link */

             reply	other threads:[~2005-02-08  5:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-02-08  5:06 Mark F. Haigh [this message]
2005-02-08  5:34 ` [PATCH 2.6.11-rc3-bk4] arch/i386/kernel/pci/irq.c: Wrong message output Greg KH
2005-02-08  5:42   ` Mark F. Haigh
2005-02-08  5:52     ` Greg KH
2005-02-08  6:07       ` Mark F. Haigh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=420848CA.2030008@spirentcom.com \
    --to=mark.haigh@spirentcom.com \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.